#链上资产管理 Trend Research's position data was just corrected, adjusted from the previously rumored 628k ETH to 580k. This correction is quite interesting—the exclusion of addresses starting with 0x9f suggests that on-chain tracking requires more careful verification of address ownership.
580k ETH at current prices amounts to approximately 20+ billion USD in scale. The movements of such large positions have reference significance for market liquidity and price expectations. The key is to watch the subsequent on-chain behavior of these 6 building position addresses—whether positions remain stable or show signs of reduction, transfer frequency patterns, and how these reflect institutional actual sentiment.
The topic of data transparency deserves attention. While on-chain information is public, the identification of address ownership often exists in gray areas. When making research and investment decisions, you cannot rely solely on single-source on-chain data; cross-verifying information from different institutions and channels is necessary to reduce the risk of misjudgment.
На этой странице может содержаться сторонний контент, который предоставляется исключительно в информационных целях (не в качестве заявлений/гарантий) и не должен рассматриваться как поддержка взглядов компании Gate или как финансовый или профессиональный совет. Подробности смотрите в разделе «Отказ от ответственности» .
#链上资产管理 Trend Research's position data was just corrected, adjusted from the previously rumored 628k ETH to 580k. This correction is quite interesting—the exclusion of addresses starting with 0x9f suggests that on-chain tracking requires more careful verification of address ownership.
580k ETH at current prices amounts to approximately 20+ billion USD in scale. The movements of such large positions have reference significance for market liquidity and price expectations. The key is to watch the subsequent on-chain behavior of these 6 building position addresses—whether positions remain stable or show signs of reduction, transfer frequency patterns, and how these reflect institutional actual sentiment.
The topic of data transparency deserves attention. While on-chain information is public, the identification of address ownership often exists in gray areas. When making research and investment decisions, you cannot rely solely on single-source on-chain data; cross-verifying information from different institutions and channels is necessary to reduce the risk of misjudgment.