ZachXBT accuses Hyperliquid of double standards and questions its Decentralization.

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Wu said that on-chain detective ZachXBT criticized Hyperliquid for forcibly liquidating and artificially setting the price ($0.0095) during the Jelly market attack incident, causing the attacker a small loss. He questioned why Hyperliquid claimed to be "powerless" when Radiant was attacked by North Korean hackers, involving a large number of victims. Hyperliquid's decision-making is clearly double-standard, exposing its governance centralization. He proposed three response options: maintain consistency and actively intervene in major events; completely decentralize and not intervene at all; introduce mechanisms to prevent malicious actors from entering from the source (such as Railgun's PPOI model).

HYPE4.5%
RDNT-0.42%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)