Recently, people keep asking if on-chain privacy is "something you can hide if you want," to which the simple answer is don't dream about it... On-chain is a public ledger; what you can do more is raise the cost of association, not become invisible. The compliance boundaries are also quite realistic: you don't touch sanctioned addresses, you don't play with suspicious "washing" methods, and at the moment of exchange/deposit and withdrawal, the questions will still be asked. The exit path is more honest than anything else.



My mom asked me a few days ago: "Does using privacy tools make you illegal?" I could only reply half-heartedly: tools themselves are not illegal, but using them makes you more likely to attract extra attention... Anyway, don’t treat "privacy" as an exemption card.

Now, AI agents and automated trading are also quite popular, with narratives being hyped up. Many people pretend not to see the security issues: who do you give your private key/authorization to, is the permission unlimited, can the contract be halted or modified? Think carefully before confirming. The potential profit lies in execution, but the potential loss often comes from authorization. That’s all for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin