Actually, everyone understands that when the funding rate hits an extreme, the market starts to "force you to choose a side": either fight hard against the other side or obediently hide from the volatility. I used to get caught up in it too, thinking that with such exaggerated rates, I might as well take the risk, but then I encountered a spike + slippage + margin shake, and the profit from the fee wasn't enough to fill the hole... Now I’m more realistic: first, see if I can withstand the worst-case scenario in ten minutes; if I can't, I won't do it, and I’d rather miss out. If I really want to take the other side, I’ll split it into smaller parts, keep some ammunition, and add more when it gets even more extreme, instead of betting everything on the market to decide life or death. Recently, that AI Agent automatic interaction system has become popular again. Honestly, anyone can talk about narratives, but once the permissions for contract + automatic order placement are given to too many, the safety boundaries become harder to control. I still prefer manual, slower actions—at least I know how I might die if I do.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin