Recently, I've been debating the issue of "on-chain privacy." To put it plainly, ordinary users shouldn't treat it as an invisibility cloak. On-chain transparency is the default; every step you take can be traced back to you. The line of compliance won't suddenly become blurry just because you used a mixing or privacy tool—at most, it can block "curious onlookers," but it can't stop those who genuinely want to investigate. My current expectation is: privacy = reducing the chance of being watched by outsiders, not a get-out-of-jail-free card.



Moreover, hardware wallets have been out of stock lately, phishing links are everywhere, and it feels like half of everyone's security awareness depends on being educated... I personally stick to whitelist addresses, layered wallets, and even more aggressive perpetual positions, but I don't use my main wallet to play around. Don't think about an invisibility cloak for now; lock the door first. Anyway, the emotional market is already enough to make me laugh.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin