Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
So recently I noticed something interesting about Bitcoin and how it survives in a market increasingly integrated with equities. Although Bitcoin is moving more in sync with tech stocks, data shows there's more happening behind the scenes.
Greg Cipolaro from NYDIG has studied this more deeply. The correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 and Nasdaq has indeed increased to around 0.5 in recent months. That number has led some to think Bitcoin is now just a proxy for tech stocks. But here’s the interesting part—stocks only explain about 25% of Bitcoin’s price movements. The remaining three-quarters? That’s purely due to unique forces in the crypto market.
Those movements stem from capital flows into Bitcoin funds, derivative positions, network adoption, and regulatory dynamics. So when Bitcoin and growth stocks move together, it more reflects global liquidity conditions rather than structural convergence between asset classes. This is important because it means Bitcoin remains a viable portfolio diversifier.
However, there’s a deeper shift in the community’s debate. In the past, people asked whether Bitcoin could survive. Now the question has changed—can Bitcoin become a reserve asset for central banks? Chamath Palihapitiya, who called Bitcoin “Gold 2.0” in 2013, now questions whether this asset fits the needs of a country’s fiscal balance sheet. Ray Dalio has also raised concerns about volatility and regulatory risks.
Cipolaro says these criticisms reflect changing expectations as Bitcoin evolves from a retail asset to an institutional one. But he sees something different here—long-term growth of Bitcoin isn’t really dependent on central bank adoption. The network has grown organically from individual users to family offices, asset managers, and ETFs. That’s a different path from past financial innovations, which usually started with institutional capital.
So the true value of Bitcoin comes from a globally distributed network, its political neutrality, and its ability to facilitate value transfers resistant to censorship. That’s Bitcoin’s real survival mechanism—not relying on institutional validation, but on its solid fundamentals. Bitcoin’s current price at $73.87K shows the market still sees value in this narrative, even though volatility remains. The more people understand the difference between short-term correlation and fundamental value, the clearer Bitcoin’s role in long-term portfolios becomes.