Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
When looking at media in the cryptocurrency industry, there's something that concerns me about conflicts of interest among journalists. Even major outlets like CoinDesk actually have complex exposures.
CoinDesk is known as a media outlet covering the crypto industry, but behind the scenes, there's a company called Bullish. Bullish is a digital asset platform that provides market infrastructure and information services. This is an important point.
CoinDesk journalists may receive stock-based compensation from Bullish. In other words, they are writing articles while having direct exposure to the company they report on. How should we think about this from a transparency perspective?
Of course, CoinDesk adopts strict editorial policies, emphasizing integrity and editorial independence. The journalists are also supposed to follow ethical guidelines. But the fact that such exposure exists is information that readers should be aware of.
Looking at the industry as a whole, the relationship between media and companies tends to become quite complex. Especially in the growing crypto world, being aware of these conflict of interest risks is important. Transparency is what builds trust, I believe.