Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Cryptocurrency lawyer says the Drift incident may constitute "civil negligence"
ME News message, April 6 (UTC+8). Lawyer Ariel Givner said that the $280 million attack on the Solana-based DeFi platform Drift Protocol could have been prevented through standard operational security procedures, and the conduct may constitute civil negligence. Because the Drift team failed to follow basic security procedures—including not storing signing keys in physically isolated systems and lacking due diligence regarding blockchain developers at industry conferences—this was allegedly the case.
The Drift team posted on the X platform that the attacker planned the operation for 6 months, initially contacting the team at a major crypto industry conference in October 2025. After building trust, the malicious actors hijacked developers’ devices through malicious links and implanted malware. Drift confirmed with medium-to-high confidence that the attackers are the same group responsible for the October 2024 Radiant Capital attack. A notice/promotional materials for a class-action lawsuit against Drift Protocol has already begun circulating.
(Source: ODAILY)