Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I've been noticing something interesting in how companies are thinking about their martech budgets lately. According to McKinsey research from 2024, roughly 80 percent of marketing technology decision-makers are expecting their budgets to increase over the next three to five years. That's not just a survey number—it's a pretty clear signal that organizations have moved past debating whether to invest in marketing technology. Now they're focused on how much and where.
The scale of this market tells you something important. Global martech budgets are operating within a market that hit approximately $589.14 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow at around 19.9 percent annually through 2034. That's not experimental spending anymore. It's structural.
What's driving this consensus among decision-makers? There are really three forces at work. First, the organizations that invested seriously in martech over the past decade have seen measurable improvements—better customer acquisition efficiency, higher retention rates, stronger campaign performance. They have proof that it works. Second, competitive pressure is real. As more companies build sophisticated data infrastructure and AI-driven personalization, the capability gap becomes visible in market outcomes. If your competitors are operating at a different level of effectiveness, you feel that pressure immediately. Third, AI has completely reopened what's possible. McKinsey's Global Institute estimated that generative AI could create between $0.8 trillion and $1.2 trillion in annual value across industries, with marketing and sales at the top of the list. Decision-makers who understand that potential aren't planning to cut their martech budgets.
What's actually changing is where the money goes. Customer data infrastructure has become foundational—AI tools need high-quality, unified data to function. So we're seeing consistent investment in CDPs and first-party data collection. Meanwhile, AI-native tools are getting accelerated adoption. Salesforce's Agentforce signed over 1,000 deals within weeks of launch. Adobe's Firefly generated 6.5 billion images by early 2024. HubSpot's Breeze AI is bringing autonomous agents to content creation across their 230,000+ customer base. These aren't niche experiments—they're mainstream budget line items now.
The organizations that consistently extract the most value from their martech budgets treat them like a portfolio. They separate foundational infrastructure spending from activation spending, review them with different success criteria, and invest in the talent needed to actually use these tools effectively. That capability development piece matters as much as the tools themselves.
If you're still building the internal case for sustained martech investment, the 80 percent consensus carries real weight. It's the aggregated judgment of professionals across industries who've seen the returns and understand the competitive dynamics. The practical move isn't to wait for more evidence—it's to start with investments you can justify with existing data, deliver results, and expand from there. The organizations building their martech capabilities now will have a meaningful advantage over those waiting for the question to become more urgent.