Banks don't like crypto? That might actually mean it's a real threat

Recently, Trump publicly criticized big banks for hindering the development of the crypto market and urged the swift passage of the CLARITY Act.
From a dramatic perspective, this is very interesting.
The logic of traditional finance has always been:
"We are protecting investors."
And the crypto industry usually automatically interprets this as:
"Don't steal our business."
Actually, it's not surprising that banks don't like crypto.
Imagine, what would happen if blockchain were truly adopted on a large scale?
Cross-border transfers completed in minutes
Fees as low as a few dollars
Funds settled without intermediaries
Seeing these three things, banks probably wouldn't be too happy.
That's also why, whenever regulatory policies discuss crypto frameworks, traditional financial institutions tend to participate very actively.
They're not opposed to innovation; they just want innovation to happen within a scope they can control.
And if the CLARITY Act is successfully promoted, it essentially provides a clearer legal position for the crypto market.
For institutional funds, this kind of certainty is actually very important.
Because the biggest enemy of institutions isn't risk, but uncertainty.
So the real significance of this might be:
The crypto market is moving from "wild growth"
toward the "rule-based era."
As for short-term price fluctuations?
That's just emotional volatility.
What truly determines the future of the industry are often those seemingly boring policy details.
#原油价格飙升