Economic uncertainty and technological turbulence define the current global context. While companies face transformation driven by artificial intelligence development, investors and economists seek stable assets that could serve as an anchor amid these changes. Jack Kong, CEO of Nano Labs, recently expressed the belief that Bitcoin represents such a stabilizing element—an asset inherently resistant to disruptive AI forces.
The key idea in Kong’s argument is recognizing the fundamental difference between Bitcoin and other technological assets. Unlike many sectors that could be transformed or threatened by AI progress, Bitcoin by nature is immune to these risks. Kong emphasizes that blockchain and artificial intelligence share common characteristics—they are both open-source and possess inherent digital DNA. This similarity does not lead to competition but to natural synergy.
Kong uses an analogy comparing Bitcoin to gold. If gold has historically been a shield of human sovereignty and stability, Bitcoin should play a similar role in the digital era. While traditional assets may be vulnerable to AI-driven market shifts and models, Bitcoin is protected by its decentralized nature and mathematical robustness.
From Digital Agents to Value: A New Economic Model
One of the most provocative scenarios Kong presents involves the future role of autonomous AI agents in the economy. He envisions a world where software agents generate economic value, create profits, and require mechanisms for storing and transferring that value. In this model, Bitcoin becomes a natural target—a secure and neutral network where these digital entities could transfer their generated value.
Such a scenario is not mere speculation but a logical outcome of ongoing trends. Autonomous agents need a way to hold and move their funds without intermediaries. Bitcoin, with its global accessibility and no need for third parties, appears to be an ideal solution for such applications. This would transform Bitcoin from an investment asset into infrastructure that underpins a new economic layer.
Protection Against Structural Unemployment: Bitcoin as Insurance
However, Kong remains realistic about the challenges we face. He warns of the risk of structural unemployment caused by the widespread adoption of AI technologies. If workers in various sectors are replaced by automation and if there is no sufficient shift to new jobs, it could lead to global economic destabilization and excessive issuance of fiat currency as part of government interventions.
In such a bleak scenario, Bitcoin establishes itself as the most important financial anchor—an asset that maintains its value independently of government policies and inflationary printing. Its ownership would offer a protective shield against monetary expansion and economic instability. Investors holding Bitcoin today would thus hedge against potential negative developments in the coming decades.
Kong does not take the timing lightly. He admits it’s uncertain whether now is the ideal time for mass Bitcoin purchases—markets are volatile and prospects uncertain. Nevertheless, he advocates integrating Bitcoin into diversified investment portfolios as a hedge and long-term holding for those seeking stability amid an unpredictable future.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Bitcoin as an anchor of stability in the era of artificial intelligence
Economic uncertainty and technological turbulence define the current global context. While companies face transformation driven by artificial intelligence development, investors and economists seek stable assets that could serve as an anchor amid these changes. Jack Kong, CEO of Nano Labs, recently expressed the belief that Bitcoin represents such a stabilizing element—an asset inherently resistant to disruptive AI forces.
Why Doesn’t Artificial Intelligence Threaten Bitcoin?
The key idea in Kong’s argument is recognizing the fundamental difference between Bitcoin and other technological assets. Unlike many sectors that could be transformed or threatened by AI progress, Bitcoin by nature is immune to these risks. Kong emphasizes that blockchain and artificial intelligence share common characteristics—they are both open-source and possess inherent digital DNA. This similarity does not lead to competition but to natural synergy.
Kong uses an analogy comparing Bitcoin to gold. If gold has historically been a shield of human sovereignty and stability, Bitcoin should play a similar role in the digital era. While traditional assets may be vulnerable to AI-driven market shifts and models, Bitcoin is protected by its decentralized nature and mathematical robustness.
From Digital Agents to Value: A New Economic Model
One of the most provocative scenarios Kong presents involves the future role of autonomous AI agents in the economy. He envisions a world where software agents generate economic value, create profits, and require mechanisms for storing and transferring that value. In this model, Bitcoin becomes a natural target—a secure and neutral network where these digital entities could transfer their generated value.
Such a scenario is not mere speculation but a logical outcome of ongoing trends. Autonomous agents need a way to hold and move their funds without intermediaries. Bitcoin, with its global accessibility and no need for third parties, appears to be an ideal solution for such applications. This would transform Bitcoin from an investment asset into infrastructure that underpins a new economic layer.
Protection Against Structural Unemployment: Bitcoin as Insurance
However, Kong remains realistic about the challenges we face. He warns of the risk of structural unemployment caused by the widespread adoption of AI technologies. If workers in various sectors are replaced by automation and if there is no sufficient shift to new jobs, it could lead to global economic destabilization and excessive issuance of fiat currency as part of government interventions.
In such a bleak scenario, Bitcoin establishes itself as the most important financial anchor—an asset that maintains its value independently of government policies and inflationary printing. Its ownership would offer a protective shield against monetary expansion and economic instability. Investors holding Bitcoin today would thus hedge against potential negative developments in the coming decades.
Kong does not take the timing lightly. He admits it’s uncertain whether now is the ideal time for mass Bitcoin purchases—markets are volatile and prospects uncertain. Nevertheless, he advocates integrating Bitcoin into diversified investment portfolios as a hedge and long-term holding for those seeking stability amid an unpredictable future.