ETH drops below $1,900: Long and short battle analysis after liquidation of Maggi's $2.28 million position and reversal strategy

On February 28, 2026, the crypto market experienced a highly dramatic on-chain event amid a continued correction. Notable investor “Maji” Huang Licheng’s ETH long position was forcibly liquidated, with approximately 1,212 ETH worth about $2.28 million being cleared. However, just minutes after the account balance dropped to only $33,600, this address reopened a new ETH long position with 25x leverage. This “liquidation and re-entry” maneuver quickly became a hot topic in the market amid ETH’s ongoing downward trend. Based on Gate exchange data and on-chain monitoring, this article dissects the event using a multi-model analysis framework and explores its potential market impact.

New $900K Position After Liquidation: Objective Event Summary

According to on-chain data analysis platforms, on February 28 Beijing time, the Ethereum address labeled “Maji” had its ETH perpetual futures long position forcibly liquidated on Hyperliquid. The liquidation involved 1,212 ETH, valued at approximately $2.28 million at the time, with a single loss of about $198,000. After the liquidation, the account balance briefly dropped to just $33,600.

Market observers quickly noted that the address did not exit the market but instead recharged funds and reopened a new ETH long position. The new position was approximately $900,000, also using 25x leverage, with a liquidation price set at $1,863. As of press time, the address remains in the position.

Five Months, 162 Long Attempts: Background and Timeline

Placing this event in a longer-term context reveals it is not an isolated trading mistake but part of a highly patterned behavior:

• Long-term Loss History: On-chain data shows that over nearly five months, this address attempted to go long various cryptocurrencies 162 times, including 18 attempts specifically on ETH.
• Net Fund Outflows: During this period, the address net deposited about $15.68 million into trading platforms. Monitoring records indicate “almost every transfer in ended in a loss.”
• Recent Liquidations: Just days before this event (Feb 23-24), the same address experienced forced liquidations on ETH and BTC long positions, with total losses exceeding $28.8 million. Market insiders note that in mid-February, the address also placed ETH short orders in the $2,100–$2,200 range, switching between long and short positions very frequently.

Leverage, Liquidation Price, and ETH Market Data & Structural Analysis

To understand why this forced liquidation occurred, it’s essential to compare position data with ETH’s market trend:

• ETH Market Context: According to Gate data, as of February 28, 2026, ETH was priced at $1,858.81. Over the past 24 hours, ETH dropped 8.80%, with a low of $1,835.1. Market sentiment indicators show a “bearish” outlook.
• Leverage Vulnerability: The address consistently used 25x leverage. Under such leverage, a mere 4% adverse price movement can wipe out the principal. ETH’s over 8% intraday decline on Feb 28 was enough to instantly breach any 25x long position that did not have additional margin.
• Position Size Estimation: The liquidated position involved 1,212 ETH. Notably, monitoring data from Feb 26 shows the liquidation price for this address was around $1,932–$1,935, roughly 5–6.3% above the actual liquidation trigger. When ETH broke below $1,900 and headed toward $1,835, this zone was quickly breached, triggering the liquidation.

Belief, Gambling, and “Contrarian Indicators”

The repeated long entries and liquidations by Maji have led to a three-tiered market perception:

• Faithful View: A minority believe that continuously buying during extreme pessimism reflects a firm belief in Ethereum’s long-term value. This contrarian “fear when others are greedy” approach has historically resulted in significant whale gains.
• Risk Warning View: The mainstream opinion considers this a cautionary tale of high-leverage trading. Critics argue that in a weak trend with ETH down over 35% in 30 days, using 25x leverage and doubling down after losses is essentially gambling, not trading. Some influencers mockingly say, “The best way to avoid losing millions is simply not to open a position.”
• Market Signal View: Some analysts see such large liquidation events as contrarian “bottoming signals.” The logic is that when high-leverage speculative positions are forcibly cleared, selling pressure temporarily eases, potentially setting the stage for a technical rebound.

Facts, Opinions, and Speculations: Clear Distinctions

When analyzing such events, it’s crucial to separate verifiable on-chain facts from market interpretations:

• Facts (On-chain verifiable): The address 0x020c…5872 (linked to Maji) had its ETH perpetual long position liquidated on Feb 28, involving 1,212 ETH. The address subsequently reopened a new ETH long with a liquidation price of $1,863. Over the past five months, this address net deposited about $15.68 million into Hyperliquid.
• Opinions (Market interpretation): Market commentators label this as “faith” or “gambling,” viewing it as a “contrarian indicator.” These are subjective judgments.
• Speculations (Data-based estimates): The total estimated loss exceeding $29 million is based on average entry and liquidation prices. The psychological motivations behind the trading behavior (e.g., “trying to recover losses” or “sunk cost fallacy”) are speculative behavioral finance analyses.

Psychological Suppression and Risk Education

This event sends at least two clear signals within the industry:

• Short-term ETH Market Sentiment Suppression: As a well-known market participant, Maji’s ongoing losses are widely circulated in the community. This may reinforce retail caution, making them hesitant to buy the dip, fearing “whales are all trapped,” thus psychologically suppressing ETH’s short-term rebound.
• Re-education on High-Leverage Risks: From a profit of $45 million in October 2025 to a $10 million loss, and now a net deposit of $15.68 million, these data points serve as vivid investor education material. They objectively demonstrate that in volatile markets, high leverage can amplify gains but also accelerate permanent capital loss.

Rebound, Bottoming, and Base Building

Based on current Gate data showing ETH at $1,858.81 and a bearish sentiment, combined with this liquidation event, we consider possible future scenarios. Note that these are purely logical analyses, not price predictions:

• Scenario 1: Short-term Technical Rebound
  • Logic: Major liquidations are often seen as “bad news fully priced in.” After a high-leverage long is wiped out, selling pressure may temporarily ease. If ETH stabilizes above the $1,835 low, short covering could trigger a modest technical rebound.
• Scenario 2: Continued Downtrend
  • Logic: ETH’s 30-day decline is about 35%, indicating a clear bearish trend. If the price continues below the new liquidation level of $1,863, it could trigger further panic. A decisive break below recent lows at $1,835 might lead to new support levels.
• Scenario 3: Long-term Consolidation
  • Logic: Bottoming requires time and volume. Only after high-leverage speculative positions are fully cleared, and if Ethereum’s ecosystem shows technological upgrades or real-world adoption catalysts, can a sustained bottom form. Currently, no such catalysts are evident.

Conclusion

Maji’s ETH long liquidation exemplifies the high-risk nature of current crypto trading. It objectively records how a single address, over five months, attempted 162 long positions, gradually consuming millions of dollars. For market participants, the lesson is not to imitate “bottom fishing” or mock losses but to reassess leverage and risk management fundamentals. In the long process of ETH finding a bottom, survival often outweighs attempting to catch a rebound.