The information battlefield is heating up. What's often overlooked: the real danger isn't always about blocking voices—it's about who's bankrolling them.



Across the crypto and Web3 space, you'll find plenty of "independent" commentators and analysts. Sounds legit, right? Problem is, many of them have already been quietly brought into the fold. Some deals run into six figures, yet nobody's talking about who's writing the checks.

The lack of transparency here is telling. When money flows behind closed doors, narratives shift. Trust erodes. And in an industry already skeptical of institutions, this kind of undisclosed backing turns your information sources into something that looks a lot less independent than advertised.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshivip
· 6h ago
That's why I never blindly listen to anyone's analysis; even six-figure deals can be overlooked. LOL
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlphavip
· 6h ago
That's why I never believe those "independent analysts" nonsense... once the money is in place, the narrative changes.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHoppervip
· 6h ago
That's why I never blindly trust those "independent analysts." Really, they hide contracts worth six figures.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMongervip
· 7h ago
nah this ain't even the real governance attack vector tho... the money is symptom, not disease. real question is why protocols even allow this mess to happen in first place
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)