Government oversight and regulatory pressure remain the primary mechanism driving major platform policy shifts. Without sustained state-level scrutiny, platforms often lack sufficient incentives to address high-risk features—particularly those enabling AI-generated synthetic content involving real individuals. The removal of such capabilities typically occurs only after sustained regulatory threats, highlighting how enforcement actions (or their credible threat) remain far more effective than voluntary corporate responsibility measures.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektHunter
· 6h ago
Regulation is the only thing that can truly control platforms; the self-discipline approach is just nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
MissingSats
· 6h ago
Basically, it still depends on regulation to hold them accountable before they make changes. Voluntary and conscious? Haha, don't make me laugh.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-40edb63b
· 6h ago
Regulation is the real powerful medicine; self-discipline is just something to listen to and forget.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivator
· 6h ago
Basically, regulation is the real parent. The platform's self-awareness? Well, might as well rely on Elon Musk's charity.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 6h ago
ngl is just saying that the platform's self-awareness is zero, and only strict regulation can do the trick...
---
So, without enforcement threats, these big companies wouldn't take any action at all.
---
It's the same old story, they only change when the government steps in. Corporate self-discipline? Haha.
---
This is the reality... voluntary responsibility is purely a joke; only penalties and threats are effective.
---
When regulatory pressure comes, they immediately change strategies. What were they pretending before?
---
That's right, relying solely on corporate ethics is unreliable; the country must regulate.
Government oversight and regulatory pressure remain the primary mechanism driving major platform policy shifts. Without sustained state-level scrutiny, platforms often lack sufficient incentives to address high-risk features—particularly those enabling AI-generated synthetic content involving real individuals. The removal of such capabilities typically occurs only after sustained regulatory threats, highlighting how enforcement actions (or their credible threat) remain far more effective than voluntary corporate responsibility measures.