The "cat and mouse game" behind the policy: the European Central Bank releases a report stating that "the high market share of Bitcoin threatens financial stability, and recommends strengthening global regulatory coordination"
On the surface, it appears to be a risk warning, but in essence, it is a power anxiety
· Bitcoin’s market cap is 2 trillion USD, less than one-tenth of the global gold market cap. How can it be a “threat to financial stability”? · The truth is: traditional central banks are discovering that their currency issuance rights are being eroded by a decentralized system. This is an unprecedented challenge since 2008.
The “Four-Step” Regulatory Script ① Stigmatization Phase (2011-2017): “Money laundering, drug trafficking, Ponzi schemes” ② Testing Control Phase (2018-2022): Exchange licenses, KYC, tax tracking ③ Integration and Regulation Phase (2023-2025): Spot ETF, custody compliance ④ Sovereign Confrontation Phase (2026-?): CBDC vs Bitcoin, direct confrontation
We are currently in the transition from phase ③ to phase ④. Every time regulators speak out, ask: What practical effect do they want to achieve?
Response Strategies
· Short-term (1-4 weeks): Regulatory negative news releases → market panic and decline → often a bottom-fishing opportunity (repeated more than 7 times in history) · Mid-term (3-6 months): The tug-of-war between the “institutional bull” driven by compliance progress and “sovereign suppression” · Long-term: Bitcoin’s ultimate opponent is not the SEC, but the central bank digital currencies (CBDC) of various countries. The real war begins then.
· Mid-term (3-6 months): The tug-of-war between the “institutional bull” driven by compliance progress and “sovereign suppression” · Long-term: Bitcoin’s ultimate opponent is not the SEC, but the central bank digital currencies (CBDC) of various countries. The real war begins then.
· Long-term: Bitcoin’s ultimate opponent is not the SEC, but the central bank digital currencies (CBDC) of various countries. The real war begins then.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The "cat and mouse game" behind the policy: the European Central Bank releases a report stating that "the high market share of Bitcoin threatens financial stability, and recommends strengthening global regulatory coordination"
· Bitcoin’s market cap is 2 trillion USD, less than one-tenth of the global gold market cap. How can it be a “threat to financial stability”? · The truth is: traditional central banks are discovering that their currency issuance rights are being eroded by a decentralized system. This is an unprecedented challenge since 2008.
We are currently in the transition from phase ③ to phase ④. Every time regulators speak out, ask: What practical effect do they want to achieve?
Response Strategies
· Short-term (1-4 weeks): Regulatory negative news releases → market panic and decline → often a bottom-fishing opportunity (repeated more than 7 times in history) · Mid-term (3-6 months): The tug-of-war between the “institutional bull” driven by compliance progress and “sovereign suppression” · Long-term: Bitcoin’s ultimate opponent is not the SEC, but the central bank digital currencies (CBDC) of various countries. The real war begins then.
· Mid-term (3-6 months): The tug-of-war between the “institutional bull” driven by compliance progress and “sovereign suppression” · Long-term: Bitcoin’s ultimate opponent is not the SEC, but the central bank digital currencies (CBDC) of various countries. The real war begins then.
· Long-term: Bitcoin’s ultimate opponent is not the SEC, but the central bank digital currencies (CBDC) of various countries. The real war begins then.