Looking at $LISA's$ recent plunge actually reveals some insights. Have you noticed the exchange's position requirements? They actually have a cap of 50U. This scale is way too conservative.

Think about why this is—the risk control department wouldn't set such strict thresholds without reason. What does this indicate? The exchange's risk warning system has long sensed the early signs and prepared defenses in advance.

From this perspective, can we infer that those cryptocurrencies with particularly strict position limits might be worth exploring? These types of coins usually mean the exchange is more cautious in its risk assessment. If we establish a diversified short position—balancing bets across multiple such small coins—the risk might actually be contained within a manageable range.

The core logic of this strategy is: using position limits as inverse indicators of risk signals, and hedging the impact of a single-point crash through diversification of long positions.