2026-01-12 09:25:44

What is the most critical factor to consider before investing in a blockchain project? I think it's token economics. Many public chain tokens are just stories, lacking real value support, ultimately turning into pure gambling chips. But the DUSK project is different; it tightly binds its token design to the hard requirement of "privacy finance."

Currently, RWA assets in the DUSK ecosystem are growing rapidly, directly supporting the token's value foundation. How to put it?

**Privacy computing is not just for show; it is a genuine resource consumption**

On the DUSK network, every compliant RWA transaction requires zero-knowledge proof computation. This is different from ordinary transfers — the computational cost is high, and it consumes significant network resources. Users purchase assets, redeem, and trade on the secondary market—all these operations require paying Gas fees in DUSK. It seems normal, but there’s more to it.

DUSK has also designed a pricing mechanism for privacy services. Do financial institutions need to use the underlying compliant primitives or call identity verification interfaces? Then they have to spend DUSK. The more institutions involved, the greater the consumption. As a result, DUSK gradually shifts from being just a transaction medium to a "financial infrastructure tax" — the larger the on-chain RWA asset scale, the greater the token demand.

This design logic is quite imaginative. As traditional financial institutions gradually integrate into the ecosystem, trillions of assets might really circulate on this chain. By then, DUSK’s consumption mechanism will truly unleash its power.

DUSK14.16%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AllInAlice

· 6h ago

Oh, this is the proper token design, not just a storytelling approach. --- Zero-knowledge proof runs for every transaction, and that burn mechanism is indeed excellent. --- The larger the RWA on-chain scale, the greater the DUSK demand. The logical chain is quite tight. --- The only concern is that the pace of institutional integration may not keep up with hype expectations. --- Privacy + finance + RWA, this combo punch sounds good, but whether it can be truly implemented depends on this year. --- Compared to those pseudo-demand projects, the fee mechanism is indeed much more hardcore. --- Trillions of assets in circulation? First, see if it can pass compliance checks before boasting. --- The biggest fear is that even with perfect design, an ecosystem that is cold and uninviting will have no users. --- The consumption mechanism indeed avoids inflation traps; this is something we considered. --- Financial infrastructure tax sounds professional, but the implementation risks are still significant.

View OriginalReply0

consensus_failure

· 6h ago

That's right, tokenomics is indeed the first filter. However, I'm still a bit cautious about RWA; it depends on real trading volume to speak. Zero-knowledge proofs do consume resources, but only if people are actually using them. Otherwise, they just become power-wasting decorations. Privacy needs are essential, no problem there. I'm just worried that traditional financial institutions will be too slow to get involved, and by then, token demand might not keep up with hype expectations. A scale of tens of trillions sounds great, but honestly, how many real assets are on RWA chains right now? That's a bit exaggerated. This consumption mechanism design is okay; it's definitely better than those useless tokens, at least it has real costs backing it. Wait, how's the user experience with DUSK? Could it be too complicated, leading to low adoption? Having just theory isn't enough.

View OriginalReply0

InscriptionGriller

· 6h ago

Old Ma knows the way. I have to say, this set of logic is indeed more thoughtful than those pure story coins on the market. RWA+ privacy computing is not just a fantasy; the real Gas consumption mechanism is right here, unlike some projects that just talk big but are not used. However... the dream of trillions still depends on whether institutions are truly willing to come.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedThrice

· 6h ago

Oh no, this logic is indeed hard to avoid... Can RWA really make a splash? --- A solid token economy is the only way out; otherwise, it's just a game of pass-the-buck. --- The issue of zero-knowledge proof burning gas... frankly, it's a disguised tax. Financial institutions need to scale up their integration. --- Trillions of assets in circulation? First, let's see who actually uses them. --- I believe in the hard demand for privacy finance, but can DUSK master this market? There are also many competitors. --- Before the consumption mechanism unleashes its power, we need to survive the bear market first.

View OriginalReply0

GasGasGasBro

· 6h ago

Hey, isn't it? Is the RWA part really growing? We need to keep an eye on this data. --- Zero-knowledge proofs run for every transaction, which indeed makes the costs hard to cover. Betting that RWA can support it. --- The name "Financial Infrastructure Tax" is excellent; the privacy needs are truly real. --- I'm just worried it might be another empty promise. Let's wait and see the on-chain data over the next three months. --- The consumption mechanism's logic is good, but will traditional financial institutions really come... --- Is the rapid growth of RWA truly fast or just hype? What's the real number? --- The hard requirement for token binding is interesting; at least it's better than those pointless projects.

View OriginalReply0