2026-01-12 08:27:36

There's a weird paradox in crypto that nobody seems to talk about. Quality devs building solid projects with polished websites, thoughtful design, and genuine effort? They get ignored or dumped on immediately. Meanwhile, rushed projects with lazy execution? Those somehow find their audience and reward early backers.

It's frustrating to watch. The market seems backwards—solid builders get overlooked while mediocre projects rake in gains. The irony is that this mess is self-inflicted. Retail investors hold the keys to changing this dynamic, but the pattern keeps repeating.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StablecoinArbitrageur

· 4h ago

honestly the correlation coefficient between dev quality and token performance is basically zero... i've backtested this (n=847 projects) and the sharpe ratio on "actually competent builders" is genuinely embarrassing. meanwhile some lazy fork gets 50x. it's not a paradox, it's just pure market inefficiency that retail keeps refusing to exploit properly

Reply0

SatoshiHeir

· 4h ago

It should be pointed out that this view is essentially a misinterpretation of market mechanisms. Let's return to the original thinking of Satoshi Nakamoto's white paper: true value discovery has never been linear, and retail investors' "irrationality" is actually a precise targeting of liquidity premiums. You mentioned "good projects being overlooked"? On-chain data shows that this is precisely a false proposition. Those projects claiming to have "exquisite websites" are often illusions created by fiat-minded thinkers. I have seen through the market voting with their feet since 2017.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 4h ago

According to on-chain data, the phenomenon of "high returns from low-quality projects" actually reflects an imbalance in the risk appetite curve of market participants—specifically analyzed as follows: High-quality projects, due to their high transparency and robust risk control mechanisms, are priced as "low-risk premiums," resulting in stable but less attractive APY; meanwhile, those with lazy execution happen to cater to retail investors' psychological expectation of "a sudden surge," representing a typical information asymmetry arbitrage window.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopReserver

· 4h ago

This is the crypto world. No matter how good the technology is, it's useless; you still have to rely on hype and luck. Really, some projects just bluff, yet they end up making a fortune. Talking sweetly is useless; the market only recognizes the logic of making money. Our group of retail investors are actually accomplices; we know it but still rush in. Technical skills are not as good as marketing skills; this is the reality. Instead of complaining, it's better to follow the trend. After all, we are the ones with no brains. Long-term holders are all losing money, while those trading short-term are just lying back and winning.

View OriginalReply0

PriceOracleFairy

· 4h ago

nah this is just market inefficiency playing out in real time... the signal-to-noise ratio's so corrupted rn that fundamentals literally became noise. watched this pattern repeat across three cycles already.

Reply0