Looking at recent on-chain data, there's a detail that really explains the situation.
Over the past year, Ethereum has absorbed nearly $50 billion in net inflows of stablecoins, with the overall supply increasing by 43.4%. How does this compare to other public chains? Tron grew by 31.9%, while Solana only by 12.6%. The gap is quite significant.
Why focus on stablecoins? Because they are the lifeblood of DeFi. The chain with the largest and fastest-growing net inflows usually indicates what? The most abundant real liquidity, the highest TVL, and the most active applications. In other words, it's where the money is flowing.
Although Ethereum's gas fees are indeed high and its transaction speed isn't as fast as new public chains, the depth and composability of core DeFi sectors like lending, DEX, and derivatives are currently unmatched. This is not just a technical issue but also an ecosystem accumulation problem—more protocols mean more stacking, more gameplay options.
Another key factor is that after the US launches a spot ETH ETF in 2025, institutional allocation channels for Ethereum will become more standardized and convenient. Large stablecoin inflows are often related to this path—fiat currency exchanges for stablecoins, then into ETH for DeFi. This isn't retail FOMO; it's capital making calm allocation decisions.
Solana's high trading volume and meme popularity are facts. But a mere 12.6% increase in stablecoins really highlights the issue—real monetary attraction still falls short. Tron mainly benefits from cross-border remittances and low-cost transfers; high-end DeFi scenarios are inherently weak.
From a cycle perspective, a large influx of stablecoins is usually an important signal of the early bull market. Funds accumulate on-chain, ready to quickly convert into ETH or other tokens when risk assets start to rise. Currently, with signs of a rebound in early 2026, this inflow could continue to expand Ethereum's upside potential.
In short, Ethereum hasn't fallen behind; instead, it continues to widen the gap in the most core capital indicators. When assessing competition among L1s, you can't just look at TPS, fees, or hot topics—you need to see where the actual funds are flowing. Right now, money is still flowing into Ethereum, and that is the most solid data.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonMathMagic
· 7h ago
From the perspective of stablecoin net inflow, it's indeed impressive, with $50 billion and a 43.4% increase... Solana's only 12.6% is a bit interesting. However, I think the key point is the institutional allocation clue; once the ETH ETF opens, the influx of funds will be more justified.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 7h ago
The flow of money into Ethereum is indeed more solid than those TPS hype. SOL just boasts popularity, while stablecoins only increased by 12.6%... this gap says everything.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 7h ago
To be honest, the flow of stablecoins is the real story here. Solana relies on memes to boost popularity, but the real funds are still accumulating on ETH.
Institutional entry is a whole different level; the depth of the ETH ecosystem is indeed unmatched.
43.4% vs 12.6%, this gap is not just hype.
Wait a minute, if this inflow continues, 2026 might really be worth watching.
Gas fees are high, but their DeFi ecosystem is very strong. As for us Solana brothers, let's not jump around randomly.
Where the money flows, there is the winner. This logic is flawless.
Once the spot ETH ETF is approved, institutions will rush in. No wonder stablecoins are surging—this is a signal, friends.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 7h ago
Money talks, 50 billion directly poured in. Who can ignore this gap? Solana's 12.6% is just outrageous. No matter how hot the trend, without real money, it's all in vain.
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Rich
· 7h ago
Net inflow of stablecoins is the key, 43.4% versus 12.6%. Sol has directly been elevated in rank this round. Solana is popular but can't retain large funds, which clearly explains the issue.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 7h ago
The net inflow of stablecoins is indeed impressive, with Ethereum at 43.4% versus Solana's 12.6%. The gap is quite significant.
Looking at recent on-chain data, there's a detail that really explains the situation.
Over the past year, Ethereum has absorbed nearly $50 billion in net inflows of stablecoins, with the overall supply increasing by 43.4%. How does this compare to other public chains? Tron grew by 31.9%, while Solana only by 12.6%. The gap is quite significant.
Why focus on stablecoins? Because they are the lifeblood of DeFi. The chain with the largest and fastest-growing net inflows usually indicates what? The most abundant real liquidity, the highest TVL, and the most active applications. In other words, it's where the money is flowing.
Although Ethereum's gas fees are indeed high and its transaction speed isn't as fast as new public chains, the depth and composability of core DeFi sectors like lending, DEX, and derivatives are currently unmatched. This is not just a technical issue but also an ecosystem accumulation problem—more protocols mean more stacking, more gameplay options.
Another key factor is that after the US launches a spot ETH ETF in 2025, institutional allocation channels for Ethereum will become more standardized and convenient. Large stablecoin inflows are often related to this path—fiat currency exchanges for stablecoins, then into ETH for DeFi. This isn't retail FOMO; it's capital making calm allocation decisions.
Solana's high trading volume and meme popularity are facts. But a mere 12.6% increase in stablecoins really highlights the issue—real monetary attraction still falls short. Tron mainly benefits from cross-border remittances and low-cost transfers; high-end DeFi scenarios are inherently weak.
From a cycle perspective, a large influx of stablecoins is usually an important signal of the early bull market. Funds accumulate on-chain, ready to quickly convert into ETH or other tokens when risk assets start to rise. Currently, with signs of a rebound in early 2026, this inflow could continue to expand Ethereum's upside potential.
In short, Ethereum hasn't fallen behind; instead, it continues to widen the gap in the most core capital indicators. When assessing competition among L1s, you can't just look at TPS, fees, or hot topics—you need to see where the actual funds are flowing. Right now, money is still flowing into Ethereum, and that is the most solid data.