Stop hyping "Moving Averages + MACD must-win" already. I've seen too many newcomers in the crypto space study candlestick charts to textbook perfection, and when it comes to real trading, they become overly confident—"I invested 50,000 and predicted everything perfectly." So what happened? Bitcoin suddenly plunged with a big red candle, and that calmness from before instantly vanished—either scared out at the floor price or impulsively going all-in to buy the dip. In the end, they blame the market for "liquidity hunting" and shift the responsibility outward.
Having been involved in the crypto market for 8 years, I responsibly tell you: the secret to position management isn't about "how much you invest," but about "how much volatility you can withstand without fear." This has nothing to do with how much technical analysis you've learned. Frankly, a reasonable position size is like installing a "pressure relief valve" for your mindset. Take last year's Bitcoin correction as an example. It dropped from 120,000 to 80,000. Two people I know faced completely different outcomes. One took a full position with leverage, eyes glued to the screen every day, still debating in the group at 3 a.m. whether to cut or hold. He ended up cutting at 78,000 and ran, only to see the market rebound above 90,000. That feeling of being hit in the thigh—imagine it yourself. And what about the second person? He entered with a small position, only using 30% of his funds. During the decline, he ate, slept, and stayed calm—because he knew that even if it fell below 70,000, the loss was within his acceptable range. When the rebound trend stabilized, he added to his position gradually, and in the end, he even made a profit. The most common mistake among beginners is "treating position size as just a number." The correct approach should be "allocating positions based on your psychological bottom line." My simple advice: never invest more than 30% of your total funds in your first position.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationOracle
· 14h ago
That's so true. Brother Yi's move was really outstanding. At the moment of cutting losses, I guess even his intestines were regretfully blue.
---
Sleeping soundly with a small position, with a full position you have to watch the market until you're bald.
---
Newcomers still studying MACD, hurry up and take a look. Position management is the real skill to survive.
---
That 30% line is really etched in my mind; even one more percent is like courting death.
---
Watching Brother Yi's story makes me feel at ease. At least he's not the only one performing so badly.
---
Psychological resilience > candlestick analysis. That hits hard.
---
At 3 a.m., debating whether to cut or not in the group chat. Isn't this exactly how I was two months ago...
---
Second Brother's 30% really made him go crazy with profits. The only difference is this mindset.
---
Moving averages plus leverage = delivering packages; giving it away is no problem.
---
Position size is like a fuse; once it burns
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 14h ago
That's right, mindset is really worth much more than technical analysis.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrant
· 14h ago
That move by Big Brother was truly a textbook example of a bad lesson. I felt sorry for him when he had to sell at 78,000...
Stop hyping "Moving Averages + MACD must-win" already. I've seen too many newcomers in the crypto space study candlestick charts to textbook perfection, and when it comes to real trading, they become overly confident—"I invested 50,000 and predicted everything perfectly." So what happened? Bitcoin suddenly plunged with a big red candle, and that calmness from before instantly vanished—either scared out at the floor price or impulsively going all-in to buy the dip. In the end, they blame the market for "liquidity hunting" and shift the responsibility outward.
Having been involved in the crypto market for 8 years, I responsibly tell you: the secret to position management isn't about "how much you invest," but about "how much volatility you can withstand without fear." This has nothing to do with how much technical analysis you've learned. Frankly, a reasonable position size is like installing a "pressure relief valve" for your mindset.
Take last year's Bitcoin correction as an example. It dropped from 120,000 to 80,000. Two people I know faced completely different outcomes.
One took a full position with leverage, eyes glued to the screen every day, still debating in the group at 3 a.m. whether to cut or hold. He ended up cutting at 78,000 and ran, only to see the market rebound above 90,000. That feeling of being hit in the thigh—imagine it yourself.
And what about the second person? He entered with a small position, only using 30% of his funds. During the decline, he ate, slept, and stayed calm—because he knew that even if it fell below 70,000, the loss was within his acceptable range. When the rebound trend stabilized, he added to his position gradually, and in the end, he even made a profit.
The most common mistake among beginners is "treating position size as just a number." The correct approach should be "allocating positions based on your psychological bottom line." My simple advice: never invest more than 30% of your total funds in your first position.