2026-01-11 14:30:09

I don't quite understand the decision-making logic of certain chains—why choose problematic individuals to join the core team? Such appointments directly affect the trust and security of the ecosystem. These personnel decisions often reveal governance flaws in the project, especially when there are hidden scam risks behind them, which can deal a bigger blow to the entire ecosystem. What exactly is the project team thinking?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CommunityJanitor

· 13h ago

It's all about the利益链, if you can't produce anything, you rely on connections to survive.

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 13h ago

I should have known earlier, the personnel appointments in this circle have never been reliable, probably all driven by vested interests.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 13h ago

Really, one lousy personnel appointment can ruin a project. I've seen it too many times.

View OriginalReply0

ShadowStaker

· 13h ago

yeah, the governance red flags here are kind of... predictable honestly. bad actors always find their way into core teams when proper vetting just doesn't exist. decentralization metrics mean nothing if you're handing keys to sketchy people lol

Reply0

GateUser-26d7f434

· 13h ago

Really, this kind of personnel appointment is outrageous. When a bad person gets in, the entire ecosystem suffers. Does the project team really have no oversight? Or do they simply not care? These days, even choosing a core member can go wrong. I just don't understand. I think this is why some blockchains are gradually losing people's trust—the team is completely rotten. No wonder some people run away; who can stand working with a project team like this?

View OriginalReply0