Traditional financial institutions are exploring the depths of blockchain technology but often get stuck on the same problem: how to protect business secrets while meeting regulatory review requirements?

Here's a real-world scenario: a fund wants to move transactions onto the chain but absolutely does not want to reveal position details to the entire network like some public blockchains do; on the other hand, regulators must have a way to intervene and conduct audits to prevent illegal activities. This seemingly irreconcilable contradiction is precisely the entry point for a certain privacy-focused public blockchain.

Its approach is as follows: use zero-knowledge proofs to default encrypt transaction details, while designing an audit protocol that allows auditing agencies and regulators to perform compliance checks with authorized access. Both sides are covered.

From a token perspective, the demand for network fuel will steadily increase alongside the growth of compliant financial activities—such as securities token issuance and private market trading. This is not hype but the infrastructure logic underlying the big trend of bringing trillions of traditional assets onto the chain.

If this path proves successful, such projects could become bridges for institutions entering DeFi, and truly "regulated DeFi" might no longer be a fantasy. Do you think this privacy and compliance compromise solution can work?