#密码资产动态追踪 In the first two weeks of the new year, has the rally of $BTC caught your attention? From $94,000 to a total market cap back to $3.1 trillion, the market is indeed warming up. But a closer look reveals that the words repeatedly mentioned by institutions are "cautiously optimistic"—where does this underlying hesitation come from?
Simply put, two forces are pulling:
On one side, on-chain data shows that the profit-taking pressure from the end of last year has significantly eased. More intuitively, funds in US spot ETFs have shifted from net outflows to net inflows. The options market also signals—buying calls is increasing, and traders are rebuilding risk positions. These are all bullish signs.
On the other side, trouble lies at the macro level. The Federal Reserve's rate cut pace remains uncertain. But the real "cornerstone" that everyone is waiting for is the movement of the US "Crypto Market Structure Act." Goldman Sachs explicitly states that whether this bill can be advanced in the first half of the year will directly determine whether institutional funds will truly enter on a large scale.
In other words, 2026 might look like this—amid the fog of macro and policy uncertainties, funds will flow more precisely into assets with solid fundamentals and the capacity to withstand volatility. It’s not about equal distribution, but smart money seeking genuine value and clear stories. The market is searching for those that can withstand cycles.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZkProofPudding
· 14h ago
Cautiously optimistic sounds like playing Tai Chi. To put it nicely, it's wisdom; to be blunt, it's lack of confidence.
Will institutions really enter the market on a large scale because of a single bill? I doubt it.
Smart money looks for real value, but what about retail investors? We'll just go and take the bait.
ETF net inflows are indeed interesting, but the macro environment is really too uncertain.
It feels like this year is all about betting on policies, betting on whether the Federal Reserve is in a good mood.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 14h ago
Institutions say cautious optimism, I just feel scared listening to it.
---
ETF net inflows are indeed attractive, but I can't wait for that bill to pass.
---
Smart money looks for real value, but as a retail investor, what can I do? Just copy the homework.
---
Before the stabilizing factor arrives, all talk is useless. Let's wait and see.
---
It's so comfortable to have equal opportunities for all. If you insist on differentiation, the market's temper is really annoying.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityJester
· 14h ago
Cautiously optimistic, to put it simply, is just not daring to bet
---
Waiting again for the bill to advance, this routine will have to be repeated for a few more years
---
Smart money looks for value, I just watch the excitement
---
Is the ETF net inflow real, or has the data been exaggerated again
---
Can it pass through cycles? Just listen, next time it will crash again
---
The attitude of the institutions actually just shows they are still on the sidelines
---
The so-called "Sea Anchor," why does it always feel like hope is floating away
---
What’s the point of easing selling pressure? Retail investors are still cutting losses
---
If it really depends on the bill, that would be too passive
---
Who can accurately predict the situation in 2026 now? Everyone is just guessing blindly
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 15h ago
Cautiously optimistic is really a perfect term; frankly, it just means having no confidence inside.
#密码资产动态追踪 In the first two weeks of the new year, has the rally of $BTC caught your attention? From $94,000 to a total market cap back to $3.1 trillion, the market is indeed warming up. But a closer look reveals that the words repeatedly mentioned by institutions are "cautiously optimistic"—where does this underlying hesitation come from?
Simply put, two forces are pulling:
On one side, on-chain data shows that the profit-taking pressure from the end of last year has significantly eased. More intuitively, funds in US spot ETFs have shifted from net outflows to net inflows. The options market also signals—buying calls is increasing, and traders are rebuilding risk positions. These are all bullish signs.
On the other side, trouble lies at the macro level. The Federal Reserve's rate cut pace remains uncertain. But the real "cornerstone" that everyone is waiting for is the movement of the US "Crypto Market Structure Act." Goldman Sachs explicitly states that whether this bill can be advanced in the first half of the year will directly determine whether institutional funds will truly enter on a large scale.
In other words, 2026 might look like this—amid the fog of macro and policy uncertainties, funds will flow more precisely into assets with solid fundamentals and the capacity to withstand volatility. It’s not about equal distribution, but smart money seeking genuine value and clear stories. The market is searching for those that can withstand cycles.