Recently, DeFi tokens are facing significant pressure, with UNI's situation particularly worth noting.
From a regulatory perspective, opposition to DeFi clauses in crypto legislation continues to intensify. Relevant organizations have publicly voiced their opposition and appeared on mainstream media platforms to call for blocking related legislation. The upcoming bill vote next week also shows Democratic efforts to obstruct, which is generally bearish for the short-term development of the DeFi ecosystem. This compliance pressure is likely to increase further, representing an evident risk factor.
Even more concerning is the supply-side pressure of the token. Currently, UNI has a circulating supply of only 630 million, but there are still 270 million tokens in the treasury that are unreleased. With an annual unlock of 20 million tokens, it takes about 40 days for the market to fully absorb these new supplies. This yearly release rhythm is similar to VC tokens, continuously draining liquidity over the years. Even more extreme is the entire unlock cycle lasting up to 10 years, making UNI's supply pressure more severe than most VC tokens.
The third hidden risk comes from the tokenomics itself. Some market analyses claim an annual deflation rate of only 0.44%, which sounds good, but the white paper explicitly states that the project team can mint up to 2% of tokens annually. This minting right is not fixed; as long as the project team needs funds, they can initiate a vote to activate the minting mechanism. This inflationary power cannot offset the amount unlocked annually, making the balance appear stable on paper but actually quite fragile.
It must be clarified that token burning has become routine in the crypto space and no longer holds much value. Comparing the circulating supply at the 2021 bull market peak with the current 630 million, the difference is stark. Even if the market rebounds in the future, it will be difficult for UNI to revisit its previous all-time high, and the next peak is likely to be significantly lower. The circulating supply data is based on the official confirmed 630 million; the over 800 million shown on-chain includes the unreleased tokens.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
fren.eth
· 01-11 12:57
It's the old routine of supply pressure again. Honestly, UNI's unlocking cycle is a bit desperate... Ten years of bleeding can't really hold up.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocityTrauma
· 01-11 12:53
It's the same narrative about supply pressure... but I have to say, UNI's 10-year unlock schedule is indeed quite extreme.
Burning tokens is just for show; the real key is cash flow. When project teams lack funds, they issue more tokens, and no one can stop that.
Compared to the peak in 2021, it's truly hard to make a comeback. Expectations need to be adjusted.
View OriginalReply0
MetaLord420
· 01-11 12:38
The supply pressure of UNI is really intense. The 10-year unlock schedule is essentially a disguised way of harvesting profits.
Is it interesting to talk about a deflation rate of 0.44%? The project team is short on funds and directly issues an additional 2%. How is this calculation made?
There’s no good news from the regulators either; in the short term, it’s just getting hammered.
Recently, DeFi tokens are facing significant pressure, with UNI's situation particularly worth noting.
From a regulatory perspective, opposition to DeFi clauses in crypto legislation continues to intensify. Relevant organizations have publicly voiced their opposition and appeared on mainstream media platforms to call for blocking related legislation. The upcoming bill vote next week also shows Democratic efforts to obstruct, which is generally bearish for the short-term development of the DeFi ecosystem. This compliance pressure is likely to increase further, representing an evident risk factor.
Even more concerning is the supply-side pressure of the token. Currently, UNI has a circulating supply of only 630 million, but there are still 270 million tokens in the treasury that are unreleased. With an annual unlock of 20 million tokens, it takes about 40 days for the market to fully absorb these new supplies. This yearly release rhythm is similar to VC tokens, continuously draining liquidity over the years. Even more extreme is the entire unlock cycle lasting up to 10 years, making UNI's supply pressure more severe than most VC tokens.
The third hidden risk comes from the tokenomics itself. Some market analyses claim an annual deflation rate of only 0.44%, which sounds good, but the white paper explicitly states that the project team can mint up to 2% of tokens annually. This minting right is not fixed; as long as the project team needs funds, they can initiate a vote to activate the minting mechanism. This inflationary power cannot offset the amount unlocked annually, making the balance appear stable on paper but actually quite fragile.
It must be clarified that token burning has become routine in the crypto space and no longer holds much value. Comparing the circulating supply at the 2021 bull market peak with the current 630 million, the difference is stark. Even if the market rebounds in the future, it will be difficult for UNI to revisit its previous all-time high, and the next peak is likely to be significantly lower. The circulating supply data is based on the official confirmed 630 million; the over 800 million shown on-chain includes the unreleased tokens.