2026-01-11 11:20:28

Seeing these two contract addresses being discussed—0x4ee7333a68e6ace272b989e2cc50c25ea75b4444 and 0xb1c034452ab1e917aee82d2461238d3465514444. To be honest, I’m not quite sure who is behind the operation, but the filtering approach is actually very simple: prioritize projects backed by well-known teams, as the risks of other small tokens are indeed hard to control.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RektRecorder

· 6h ago

They're all obscure addresses. How could I possibly place a bet? It still depends on the team's background.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinHunter

· 8h ago

If you're not sure who's operating, then don't touch it. This is my blood and tears lesson. --- Throwing the contract address randomly is still about whether the team is reliable or not. Small coins are really too easy to get trapped. --- That's right, projects with well-known endorsements are indeed lower risk. Small retail investors should stick to this bottom line. --- I have never heard of these two addresses at all. It looks like another bunch of unknown meme coins. --- The screening approach is correct, but the problem is that we retail investors simply can't tell whose endorsement is reliable and who's just Photoshopped. It's too difficult. --- Fortunately, someone reminded me, or I would have had to cut losses again. --- The risk of unknown small coins is indeed hard to control. Let's just honestly follow the big teams.

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressHunter

· 8h ago

I haven't heard of these two addresses either, but to be honest, small-cap coins are indeed a trap.

View OriginalReply0

RealYieldWizard

· 8h ago

Bro, I haven't heard of these two addresses either. As I always say—if I don't recognize the project, I pass. I've learned my lesson from too many rug pulls. Only projects with team endorsements are worth considering; 90% of small tokens are just money grabs.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-addcaaf7

· 8h ago

Coins with unknown backgrounds are always the easiest to be exploited; it still depends on the team's background.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 8h ago

I haven't heard of these two addresses either. To be honest, they look like small-cap projects at first glance. Let's stay skeptical.

View OriginalReply0