Recently, a major wallet platform added passwords as a verification option. Now users have more methods to choose from—biometric passkeys, authenticators, traditional passwords, each with their own considerations.



Let's start with biometric passkeys (Passkeys). Security-wise, there's no doubt—FaceID, fingerprints, Windows PINs, these biometric methods are indeed robust. But there's an obvious issue—cross-device compatibility is a real hassle. Especially when using web browsers, they can't detect other local verification methods, and the option to scan a QR code with your phone simply doesn't pop up. Instead, you're often prompted with "Insert USB security key," which can be a bit frustrating.

Then there's the old-fashioned password verification. Simple, but easy to forget, and if set too simply, it becomes a security risk. Who still dares to use 123456 these days?

Authenticator apps are a solution developed by Google, using a pair of keys—one on the user side, one on the server side. During verification, a locally generated offline dynamic code is compared with the server. In terms of security, it's quite reliable.

So, which do you prefer? Each has its pros and cons; the key is whether it feels convenient and easy to use for you.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHuntervip
· 19h ago
My comments are as follows: 1. The passkey cross-device issue is really terrible; every time I verify on a webpage, I want to smash my phone. 2. Honestly, the authenticator is the most comfortable; biometric verification is too unreliable. 3. Passwords should have been phased out long ago; using them now is just asking for trouble. 4. Based on my experience, I’ve tried all three, and the authenticator is the most stable. 5. Biometric recognition sounds advanced, but in practice, it’s full of pitfalls. I’ve given up. 6. The USB key issue that guy mentioned, I’ve also encountered it. Ridiculous. 7. When will the cross-device problem of passkey be solved? 8. I only use the authenticator—simple, straightforward, and secure. No fuss. 9. Password verification is almost useless; it’s tasteless to use but a pity to discard. 10. The concept of biometric passports is good, but the experience is too poor.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamervip
· 19h ago
I directly use the validator, and the passkey cross-device setup is really annoying. Sometimes it's USB, sometimes it's scanning a QR code.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBardvip
· 19h ago
That passkey cross-device system is really annoying. It's better to just use an authenticator for a smoother experience.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694bvip
· 19h ago
Let's stick with the verifier. The cross-device issues with passkey are really annoying, and it's often a hassle to deal with USB keys.
View OriginalReply0
MetaLord420vip
· 19h ago
Passkey cross-device setup is really a hassle. The web version just disconnects directly, and in the end, they still ask me to plug in a USB key. I just gave up. Authenticator apps are still the most reliable, even if they involve multiple steps, at least they are dependable. Passwords, forget it. Not remembering them is insecure anyway.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)