There's an interesting tension worth examining: when major blockchain advisors hold significant influence over mainstream platform algorithms, how should potential conflicts of interest be managed?

Consider the scenario—if a platform's recommendation system actively de-prioritizes crypto-related content across the board, but then makes exceptions for posts from certain blockchain projects or their ecosystem members, that selective filtering raises questions about algorithmic fairness and transparency.

Take Solana as an example: if posts about major layer-1 networks receive preferential treatment compared to other crypto discussions, does that reflect genuine editorial policy or undisclosed commercial relationships? Users deserve clarity on whether algorithmic decisions are based on neutral principles or influenced by advisory positions held by decision-makers.

This isn't just about one platform or one chain—it's about how crypto ecosystems interact with traditional tech infrastructure, and whether these relationships are being conducted with full transparency.