When policymakers point fingers at investors rather than addressing systemic barriers, it can actually undermine housing supply reforms. By scapegoating the investment community, there's a risk of playing directly into the hands of those who oppose market-friendly permitting reforms—reforms that could genuinely unlock residential supply and ease housing constraints. The irony is that investor participation often catalyzes development. Without understanding this market dynamic, policy responses may end up worsening the very problems they aim to solve.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainChef
· 17h ago
yo this is exactly like blaming the sous chef when the kitchen's actual problem is a half-baked permit system... policymakers really out here seasoning the wrong ingredient when they should be fixing the recipe itself, ngl
Reply0
GasOptimizer
· 17h ago
In plain terms, this is a typical policy rent-seeking issue. Data shows that the capital flow of real estate investors is directly linked to over 80% of new home supply, but now they are instead made the scapegoats? This logic is comparable to blaming MEV during high Gas fee periods—fundamentally missing the core issue. The real bottleneck is zoning regulations, not investors.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOops
· 17h ago
They're blaming the investors again... I really can't understand it.
View OriginalReply0
memecoin_therapy
· 17h ago
That's right, blaming investors is really just a temporary fix and ultimately gives a weapon to those opposing reform.
When policymakers point fingers at investors rather than addressing systemic barriers, it can actually undermine housing supply reforms. By scapegoating the investment community, there's a risk of playing directly into the hands of those who oppose market-friendly permitting reforms—reforms that could genuinely unlock residential supply and ease housing constraints. The irony is that investor participation often catalyzes development. Without understanding this market dynamic, policy responses may end up worsening the very problems they aim to solve.