The development approach of the DUSK project is quite interesting—combining privacy protection with regulatory compliance, which is indeed rare in the crypto ecosystem. Their designed network architecture allows privacy and compliance to coexist, rather than being mutually exclusive.



From a technical perspective, DUSK has realized the concept of programmable privacy, enabling institutional users and DeFi applications to protect transaction privacy while meeting regulatory requirements. This has practical significance for traditional financial institutions entering the blockchain ecosystem—allowing them to enjoy the benefits of on-chain transparency without exposing sensitive transaction data.

This direction is indeed a key step for mainstream financial institutions adopting encryption technology. The market demand for privacy + compliance solutions is evident, and DUSK has brought this demand to fruition, making it worth ongoing observation.
DUSK9.9%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatchervip
· 5h ago
Privacy and compliance can coexist? Now that's the right path. Those who kept endlessly shouting "privacy first" should have woken up by now. Damn, finally someone figured this out. This is how institutional adoption should work. My god, the traditional finance people have been waiting for this. DUSK's move is really smart. Honestly, this is what the future looks like, not that old black-and-white argument. Programmable privacy has some substance to it. I want to see how they play this out next. Fresh angle, but we still need to see how it actually lands. Compliance is the inevitable trend. Those hardcore privacy advocates should listen to this. I gotta say, the thinking is really different here. Keeping an eye on this. Suddenly understand why institutions were so cautious. This is how it should be designed. This is actually the breakthrough thinking. All those previous projects got it wrong.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractWorkervip
· 6h ago
Can privacy and compliance coexist? This idea is indeed brilliant, but will it actually be implemented in practice? --- Programmable privacy sounds very appealing, but will traditional finance really adopt it? --- This direction is correct, the question is whether institutional users will buy into it... keep watching --- Privacy + compliance, sounds good, but how many practical scenarios are actually usable? --- Finally, some projects are seriously considering this issue, but whether it will succeed depends on market response --- I like this idea; it's much more reliable than those all-or-nothing projects
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkepticvip
· 11h ago
Can privacy and compliance coexist? This is the correct approach. The previous privacy coins were too extreme. --- By the way, the idea of DUSK really hits the pain points of traditional finance. It’s exactly the practical solution needed. --- Programmable privacy sounds good, but the key is how much can actually be implemented. It depends on subsequent execution. --- Wait, will regulatory authorities really buy into this design? Feels like there are still many pitfalls to step into. --- Finally, there’s a project working on this. The ecosystem needs something that bridges both ends. --- Wow, wanting both privacy and compliance is quite challenging. Easy to say, hard to do.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesisvip
· 11h ago
On-chain data shows recent interesting changes in the DUSK contract. Programmable privacy is indeed a breakthrough, but it depends on how stable the subsequent deployment will be. From the code, no one has dared to do both privacy and compliance together before... it's worth monitoring late at night. Based on past experience, institutions usually test such solutions before entering the market. DUSK has identified a pain point, and unsurprisingly, there will be followers later on. However, compliance... the interesting part is who will define the standards? The waters here might be deeper than expected.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHatvip
· 11h ago
Can privacy and compliance coexist? Sounds good, but will banks really use it?
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBotvip
· 11h ago
Can privacy and compliance really go hand in hand? It's a bit tough to pull off... but the idea of DUSK really resonated with me. The folks on Wall Street have been waiting for something like this; programmable privacy sounds very professional. If this really gets implemented, traditional finance will adopt it much faster. But it still depends on how the execution goes later on—don't let it turn into just a PPT project.
View OriginalReply0
ChainProspectorvip
· 11h ago
Can privacy and compliance coexist? This idea is indeed innovative, but will traditional finance really buy into it? --- Programmable privacy sounds good, but I’m not sure if it can support institutional-level demands. --- Finally, a project has thought of this layer; the crypto world lacks such pragmatic solutions. --- Privacy + compliance is the right direction, but the key is whether it can be implemented. --- If it can truly be realized, it would be great news for the DeFi ecosystem, and regulators wouldn’t be so resistant. --- It sounds good, but the technical difficulty of implementation shouldn’t be small, right? --- I feel this is the correct way to combine blockchain and traditional finance. --- Interesting, worth paying attention to how the progress unfolds.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchormanvip
· 11h ago
Privacy and compliance can coexist, and this idea is indeed fresh. Finally, there’s a project that doesn’t have to choose between the two. --- The biggest fear for institutional entry is still regulatory scrutiny. DUSK has found an exit in this wave. --- Programmable privacy sounds good, but whether it can be practically implemented is the key point to watch. --- Traditional finance is stubborn—wanting transparency but also privacy, which exhausts developers. If DUSK can truly balance both, the market will definitely buy it. --- Honestly, the competition in this field is quite fierce. Monero and Zcash have long been working on privacy. How long can DUSK survive by playing the "compliance + privacy" card? --- Wait, can this really be accepted by regulators? Or is it just another self-consoling innovation?
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPCvip
· 11h ago
Can privacy and compliance be satisfied at the same time? This idea is indeed fresh; traditional financial institutions have probably been waiting for such a solution for a long time.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)