It's telling that even with virtually unlimited access to Grok 4.1, xAI and Cursor ultimately went with Opus 4.5 instead. Says a lot about the actual gap between different models in real-world performance. The choice hints at something deeper—test-time compute alone doesn't solve everything. Sometimes raw inference power takes a backseat to whatever edge another model brings to the table.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DAOdreamer
· 3h ago
ngl, this shows that light mining power really isn't enough, opus still has some stuff.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 17h ago
Algorithm selection never lies; having resources, I still chose Opus, which shows that Grok's hype is indeed a bit excessive.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 23h ago
It seems Opus still has some potential; just stacking computing power alone can't save the situation.
View OriginalReply0
EternalMiner
· 01-10 21:02
This is very interesting. No matter how strong Grok is, it has to give way to Opus, proving that real combat performance is the true hero.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizard
· 01-10 21:00
Well... to put it simply, it's something that can't be generated by computing power. Opus still has some things, after all.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 01-10 20:50
Well... to be honest, it's a bit heartbreaking. Grok has been hyped for so long, but in the end, they still chose Opus. That's awkward.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 01-10 20:41
Laughing out loud, no matter how awesome Grok 4.1 is, it can't compare to what people can actually use. That's the difference between going all-in and guaranteed profit.
View OriginalReply0
Web3Educator
· 01-10 20:33
ngl the fact they ditched grok for opus says everything about benchmarks vs actual utility... test-time compute is just a number at the end of the day
It's telling that even with virtually unlimited access to Grok 4.1, xAI and Cursor ultimately went with Opus 4.5 instead. Says a lot about the actual gap between different models in real-world performance. The choice hints at something deeper—test-time compute alone doesn't solve everything. Sometimes raw inference power takes a backseat to whatever edge another model brings to the table.