Data privacy has become a core concern in the AI era. Currently, massive amounts of information are stored in various platforms, and users often feel helpless regarding data security. Recently, I came across the Walrus protocol, which offers a different approach.



Compared to traditional reliance on a single server, Walrus adopts a globally distributed network storage. Your files are no longer concentrated in the hands of a single institution but are distributed across multiple locations, fundamentally reducing single-point risks. Coupled with sophisticated encoding technology, it ensures fast data access while avoiding the drawbacks of centralized storage. In practical use, read latency is not significantly noticeable.

The Seal module is a standout feature of this system. It allows users to control who can access which data with fine granularity, similar to setting a safe. Sensitive information such as medical records and financial documents remain visible only to authorized persons, even when stored online. This is especially critical for privacy-related application scenarios.

Walrus has received strategic support from the Sui ecosystem. As a native storage layer, it can deeply integrate with the ecosystem, making development paths relatively clear. From the application side, an increasing number of AI projects and digital creators are choosing to connect, indicating that this solution truly addresses market demand.

In terms of security, it employs multiple technologies to ensure long-term data availability, which is vital for any storage system.
WAL4.32%
SEAL-8.91%
SUI-0.49%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTBlackHolevip
· 01-11 13:23
Distributed storage should have been popularized long ago; centralized storage is just a ticking time bomb. The idea of Walrus is pretty good, and upon closer inspection, the Seal module can indeed solve the pain points of sensitive data. Another project relying on the Sui ecosystem for blood transfusion; the ecosystem effect still depends on the subsequent application volume. The privacy aspect is well explained, but I worry it will ultimately become just a slogan. If data is dispersed, won't it actually increase management costs? It's not that simple. Seal's design is interesting, but true privacy protection depends on whether the key management is properly implemented. Honestly, it still depends on who can be the first to implement it on a large scale; right now, everyone is just making promises. Is the multi-chain storage era coming? It feels like there are a bunch of Web3 storage projects, but what users really need is stability.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMinervip
· 01-10 19:51
Distributed storage sounds good, but how many people are actually using it on the chain? --- The Seal module is indeed interesting; fine-grained permission control is definitely a necessity. --- It's the Sui ecosystem again... There are so many ecosystem projects, but only a few will truly survive. --- Is the read latency not obvious? That depends on the specific data volume. Try with large files. --- I'm still a bit skeptical about putting medical and financial data on the chain. Is it really secure enough? --- Alright, it looks reliable, but would ordinary users pay for privacy? --- Finally, there's an alternative to centralized storage, but adoption rate is the key.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyervip
· 01-10 19:50
Distributed storage finally has someone taking it seriously, much more reliable than those centralized things. --- I'm interested in Seal's access control; finally I can decide who sees what. --- Another project in the Sui ecosystem. This ecosystem is really working hard. --- No obvious read latency? I need to test it myself to believe it. --- With so many players in the Web3 storage race, why can Walrus win? --- Storing medical and financial data on the blockchain—can this risk really be controlled? --- It feels like every time there's a new protocol or solution, but in the end, they still use the same old brands. --- Is Suit's support valuable? The key is to have real applications. --- If this thing runs away, can the data be recovered? That's my concern. --- Fine-grained access control sounds great, but it won't be cumbersome to operate in practice, right?
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfessionvip
· 01-10 19:49
The distributed storage approach is indeed interesting, much more reliable than those centralized platforms. Speaking of Seal's fine-grained permission management, finally there's a trustworthy place for medical and financial data. Is the support for the Sui ecosystem reliable, or is it just another round of hype? I need to test the read latency myself since it's not obviously noticeable; don't let the hype mislead you. It seems like all Web3 storage solutions are competing; how long can Walrus last? Multiple technologies backing it up sound quite professional, but technical strength doesn't necessarily mean a strong product.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeOnChainvip
· 01-10 19:46
Distributed storage is indeed a trend, but whether Walrus can truly withstand large-scale applications remains to be seen. --- The Seal feature is well-designed; fine-grained permission control is indeed helpful for privacy scenarios. --- Another Sui ecosystem? It seems that recently, ecosystem tokens are all about storage solutions. How many of them are actually usable? --- Low read latency is crucial. The biggest pitfall of distributed solutions is speed, but it looks like the optimization is decent. --- How does regulatory authority view on-chain storage of medical data and similar information? It always feels like there could be policy risks. --- Multiple technologies ensure availability. Sounds good, but what are the specifics? What encryption schemes are used? --- More and more creators are joining, but what does that mean? It still depends on real usage data and retention rates. --- The selling point of reducing single-point risks is getting tiresome. The key question is whether it can be attacked. --- Setting permissions like a safe is a good analogy, but is it really that straightforward? --- Sui's native storage layer sounds great, but how far can the Sui ecosystem itself go? That's still a question.
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91vip
· 01-10 19:26
Distributed storage does seem to be the trend, but whether Walrus can truly be implemented remains to be seen. To be honest, Seal's permission management system sounds good, but what about centralized key management? Still need to be cautious. Sui ecosystem support definitely adds points, but the key is whether real users will buy into it.
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashiervip
· 01-10 19:21
Distributed storage sounds good, but can we really trust it? It still depends on actual user feedback. --- The Seal module really hits the pain point; privacy is now a very urgent issue. --- Is it another Sui ecosystem? Why do these storage solutions all cluster around a certain public chain? --- No matter how good it sounds, the business model has to work, or it’s just a dead end. --- Huh, does decentralized storage have no noticeable latency? This needs to be verified; it sounds a bit uncertain. --- The fine-grained privacy control is indeed imaginative, but most users probably won't use this feature. --- Why is it always storage layer startups? It feels like this track isn’t very competitive. --- AI project integration can only indicate that the market is testing the waters; whether it succeeds depends on subsequent data.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt