2026-01-10 18:30:17

Ethos's interactive gameplay is pretty interesting—choosing left or right, with the two options directly corresponding to different NFT acquisition methods. The left side uses a burning mechanism for minting. It feels like this kind of participation is quite engaging, and community discussions are quite lively. If you were to participate, which direction would you choose? The burning minting model is also quite interesting from an economic design perspective for the project.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakeOrRegret

· 01-10 18:59

The logic of burning and forging seems a bit shaky to me; it just feels like a scheme to consume liquidity.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-10 18:58

The burning and minting logic is okay, but I'm worried about the inflation being too fierce later on.

View OriginalReply0

NFTBlackHole

· 01-10 18:54

I directly choose the left; the burning minting strategy is the true deflationary logic. The one on the right is too conventional.

View OriginalReply0

CodeSmellHunter

· 01-10 18:49

The burn forging gameplay is indeed intense, directly causing FOMO, but I still think the one on the right is more reliable.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 01-10 18:47

The burn and mint strategy I've seen several times before, but the key is whether the project team is genuine or not. Choose the left one. Burning tokens to exchange for NFTs at least can control inflation, which is much better than just printing new coins out of thin air. This gameplay can indeed generate hype easily, but don't be blinded by the participation rate.

View OriginalReply0

CompoundPersonality

· 01-10 18:40

I choose the left. The burning minting gameplay really has some substance, and I feel the project team put some thought into the economic model. --- The right side is too conventional; the mechanism on the left is more attractive to me. --- If the burning setup is well executed, it can directly boost scarcity, and I am optimistic about that. --- However, this kind of multiple-choice interaction feels like a form of public opinion guidance—smart operation. --- The left side went all in. I'm waiting to see how the subsequent economic design unfolds.

View OriginalReply0