2026-01-10 18:30:16

The stance on certain projects is a bit vague. Honestly, it's more convincing to present trading records and concrete evidence. The market is hot right now, but I prefer to wait and see, not rushing to enter. However, I do hold a position in Trove Markets, which I have been following. Ultimately, I am optimistic about the development direction of Hyperliquid, and this path is worth paying attention to.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

consensus_failure

· 01-10 18:59

Speaking of which, just talking is useless; you have to back it up with data. Hyperliquid is indeed interesting, but there are too many followers now, so we still need to wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSupportGroup

· 01-10 18:58

Statements are all false; using data to speak is the hard truth.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSweaterFan

· 01-10 18:55

Talking is useless; you have to speak with real gold and silver.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 01-10 18:53

It should be noted that "falsification" is always more powerful than "confirmation"—talking positively without any trading records is just another form of air coin narrative. What do on-chain data indicate? Nothing at all. That’s the problem. However, Hyperliquid is indeed an interesting angle; the future of derivatives... worth paying attention to.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-6bc33122

· 01-10 18:33

A faithful word is not beautiful; beautiful words are not trustworthy. Speak with data, and don't rely on empty talk.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSnapHunter

· 01-10 18:30

There's nothing wrong with what you said; just talking is indeed pointless. Same here, Hyperliquid does have some potential, but we need to observe a bit more.

View OriginalReply0