Here's the thing about protectionism: it's keeping growth intact for now. That part isn't really up for debate. But here's where it falls flat—industrial policies and tariffs were supposed to do one specific thing, and they're just not delivering. Manufacturing jobs keep declining regardless. The tools are there, the intention is there, yet the outcome nobody's actually seeing. The gap between what these policies promised and what they're actually achieving keeps widening.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropSkeptic
· 01-10 18:04
Protectionism sounds good in theory, but can it really create manufacturing jobs? Why do I see the data actually declining?
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrel
· 01-10 17:48
Protectionism... To put it simply, it's like drawing a delicious pie, but what about the actual output? Manufacturing jobs are still disappearing, and I don't see any difference.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 01-10 17:46
Basically, it's just hype. The tools are in place, and the ideas are not bad, but nothing concrete is coming out... Manufacturing jobs should be there, but they're not, and the gap is becoming more and more embarrassing.
Here's the thing about protectionism: it's keeping growth intact for now. That part isn't really up for debate. But here's where it falls flat—industrial policies and tariffs were supposed to do one specific thing, and they're just not delivering. Manufacturing jobs keep declining regardless. The tools are there, the intention is there, yet the outcome nobody's actually seeing. The gap between what these policies promised and what they're actually achieving keeps widening.