It's becoming increasingly clear how easily authorities weaponize "safety concerns" to justify sweeping restrictions. The pattern repeats: first comes a vague threat, then the machinery of control activates. Every controversial moment becomes ammunition for tightening the noose around digital freedoms. They don't need legitimate reasons anymore—any incident serves as convenient cover for the next layer of censorship. The narrative shifts so quickly that by the time people question it, the new restrictions have already become normalized. This is precisely why decentralized systems matter. In a landscape where gatekeepers constantly expand their authority under the pretense of protection, truly open networks become essential infrastructure for preserving what's left of unrestricted communication.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatorFlashvip
· 10h ago
Regulatory's set of "safety" narratives is like the lending liquidation trigger threshold—once set, it executes automatically, leaving no room for negotiation. The data looks cold, but the consequences are real.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegretvip
· 11h ago
This set of "safety" excuses is really worn out, always the same tricks... --- Honestly, the path of centralization is getting more and more sinister; they are counting on our fear. --- Laughing to death, first fabricate a threat, then push new rules—perfect crime. --- Wait until we realize it's already a default rule; this tactic is too clever. --- DeFi and decentralization are the best answers to oppose this system. --- Every time "for safety," they add another rope, but who defines safety? --- NGL, looking at this trend, control欲望 is getting stronger; Web3 is no longer a choice but a necessity. --- Just until they package all freedom as "risk"... --- And it just proves why a single gateway should not hold the dominant voice.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalistvip
· 11h ago
I've heard this explanation too many times. Every time it's "for safety," and next time they change the reason, jumping back and forth.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6cvip
· 11h ago
ngl, this "for safety" excuse has really been overused, every time it's the same routine...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)