Here's something that really makes you think: if the government can't step in to save a pizza business when it's struggling, then what's the whole point of having bailout mechanisms in the first place? It raises a fair question about who actually gets to benefit from crisis intervention and why certain industries get special treatment while others don't. The selective nature of economic rescue operations says a lot about how the system really works versus what we're told about equal opportunity and fair markets. When you zoom out and look at which entities get the safety net and which ones fall through the cracks, the logic starts to feel pretty arbitrary.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockwatcher9000vip
· 31m ago
ngl This is the true face of the system. The promised fair competition results are all about paving the red carpet for the big boys.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmesvip
· 01-09 20:21
Basically, it's the game rules for the wealthy; small business owners simply can't get into the game.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayervip
· 01-09 20:18
NGL, this is a joke. When big banks collapse, the government kneels to rescue them; when small businesses fail, they say it's market choice... just a game of power.
View OriginalReply0
RektHuntervip
· 01-09 20:07
ngl, this is the true face of the system... When big banks have problems, they are directly rescued; small businesses are left to fend for themselves.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)