The long-term development of blockchain finance has been plagued by a paradox: either transactions are completely transparent, causing institutions to stay away, or they are immersed in anonymity, leaving no room for regulation. The existence of this divide has made it difficult for many promising technological solutions to be implemented smoothly.



As early as 2018, some people recognized the essence of this problem — the real financial world does not choose absolute transparency or complete concealment. What it needs is a capability: to hide when necessary and reveal when appropriate, finding a balance between the two extremes. This is precisely the bridge that needs to be built between traditional financial systems and decentralized applications.

From an architectural perspective, modular design is the key to the solution. Breaking down different functions into independent components — compliance modules, privacy components, auditing tools, etc. — allows users to assemble them as needed. This approach is especially attractive to teams planning to issue security tokens or build compliant DeFi platforms, because it enables projects to maintain on-chain advantages without sacrificing the legal validity of the real world.

Even more clever is that zero-knowledge proof technology has been ingeniously transformed into a compliance tool. Transaction details can be kept confidential, but as long as regulators or auditors have the corresponding keys, they can fully verify the legality of the transactions — this is true "selective disclosure," neither a black box operation nor an escape route, but a language that institutional investors can understand and accept.

Currently, the RWA tokenization wave is surging, with many blockchain platforms focusing on asset access but ignoring compliance frameworks. This bottom-up approach to considering compliance is the correct posture to truly prepare for bringing real assets onto the chain.
RWA1.81%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquiditySurfervip
· 11h ago
Wow, this is the real way to understand finance. Only when selective disclosure is made can institutional investors feel safe to surf.
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegenvip
· 11h ago
so basically they're finally admitting the whole "transparency vs privacy" thing was always a false choice... took us this long to realize we just need both toggles flipped at the right time? lmao, the amount of capital that got liquidated while everyone was still debating this in 2018 discourse channels.
Reply0
MetaDreamervip
· 11h ago
That's right, the tactic of selective disclosure should have been popularized long ago. Now, those projects that only focus on asset on-chain are really too naive.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHolevip
· 11h ago
Someone finally hit the nail on the head. The issue of selective disclosure has really been overlooked by most projects. Now everyone is just thinking about launching assets quickly; compliance can be dealt with later. Inevitably, there will be a crash.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)