2026-01-09 19:22:03

Dusk's approach to this L1 chain is a bit different from other privacy projects. To put it simply, it has two main selling points.

First, on the technical side. Dusk has developed a "programmable privacy" solution. It might sound a bit abstract, but what does it actually mean? They built a set of SBC virtual machines—that is, a confidential contract execution environment. What's impressive about this? Ordinary privacy coins can only hide transaction information, but Dusk allows developers to build applications directly on this virtual machine. You can protect user data privacy while also enabling the logic to be publicly verifiable—that is, achieving both privacy and transparency simultaneously. This is a significant upgrade over just creating a privacy transaction layer, directly adding privacy capabilities at the DApp level.

Second, regarding the ecosystem. The project team has set up a Grant fund to support developers. Since the on-chain ecosystem is still in its early stages, there are ample opportunities for participation. If you're a developer optimistic about privacy, entering at this stage offers promising potential.

The privacy sector in finance is a real demand, and Dusk has found a relatively unique entry point—not just creating a privacy coin, but building privacy infrastructure. This approach is worth considering.

DUSK10,09%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTRegretful

· 3h ago

Damn, privacy infrastructure is truly the real necessity, much more reliable than those purely focused on privacy coins. Programmable privacy sounds a bit虚, but the idea of having both privacy and verifiable logic really has room for imagination. Early ecosystem development plus Grant support is indeed a good time to get on board. Finally, projects in the privacy track are starting to understand that it's not about hiding away, but about building infrastructure. Dusk's approach is deeper than other privacy projects; the privacy needs at the DApp layer have indeed been neglected for too long. Getting in now is better than following the trend later; it's a pity to just watch from the sidelines when the ecosystem hasn't even taken off yet. If the SBC virtual machine really works, developers will definitely flock to it. Honestly, the privacy sector has often been filled with pseudo-necessities, but financial privacy truly has a market. However, whether this chain is reliable depends mainly on whether the ecosystem can truly develop; Grant is just the initial stage, and later it still depends on whether top applications emerge. Achieving both fish and bear paws is an ideal state; whether it can be done in practice still needs time for verification. Not to mention, the privacy infrastructure as a niche is indeed different from other projects and worth关注.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 01-09 19:40

Programmable privacy sounds awesome; whether it can be realized depends on how it is implemented in the future. There is indeed an opportunity to get involved at this early stage, but I'm worried it might turn into the next PPT chain. Building privacy infrastructure is much more attractive than just speculating on privacy coins. For the SBC virtual machine, the key still depends on how developers will use it. What kind of developer engagement can this stage of grants attract? That’s the real test. It's quite interesting and worth paying attention to. However, the tactics in the privacy chain track are quite deep. Why can Dusk break through? Early ecosystem gaps definitely mean opportunities, but they also come with high risks. The privacy capabilities at the DApp layer sound promising, but I wonder if the user experience will be subpar.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-09 19:36

Programmable privacy is indeed a fresh angle, much stronger than privacy coins that only hide transactions. The early-stage Grant mechanism... devs who get in now really have a chance to cut into others. Privacy infrastructure is a good idea, but the key is whether the ecosystem can take off. NGL, this SBC virtual machine design sounds promising, but I'm just worried it's more concept than actual implementation. Privacy needs at the DApp layer definitely exist, but whether Dusk can succeed depends on adoption. This feels a bit like betting on a privacy sector explosion... whether you believe it or not, I'm getting on board first. I'm optimistic about DeFi privacy, but I just don't know how long Dusk can survive. Another L1 project claiming to be infrastructure—there are so many of these, why would this one stand out? I like programmable privacy, but how many practical scenarios are actually usable?

View OriginalReply0

SwapWhisperer

· 01-09 19:26

Programmable privacy has some potential, but the early ecosystem is still too cold. --- The idea of privacy infrastructure is indeed more advanced than just privacy coins, but I wonder if it can truly break out. --- SBC virtual machine sounds impressive, but what's the actual activity level in the ecosystem? Are there any noteworthy applications? --- Having both fish and bear paws sounds comfortable, but the key is whether there are genuine demanders willing to pay. --- Grant funding to support developers is a very common approach; the main thing is to see who is actually building something here. --- Whether privacy needs are real or fake is uncertain right now; no one can say for sure. --- Entering at an early stage carries high risks; otherwise, it might just become another silent chain. --- Building privacy infrastructure requires more execution capability than just creating privacy coins. Whether Dusk can hold up remains to be seen.

View OriginalReply0

DEXRobinHood

· 01-09 19:25

The idea of programmable privacy is indeed interesting, much deeper than those pure privacy coin approaches. --- Early ecosystem entrants still have opportunities; the key is whether they can truly develop products. --- Privacy infrastructure is indeed more imaginative than the niche of privacy coins. --- The real key is whether the SBC virtual machine can be implemented; it all looks great on paper. --- Supporting developers with grant funds sounds good, but I'm just worried it might end in failure. --- Achieving both fish and bear paw? That's a bit of an overstatement; it really depends on how well it can be realized. --- Privacy needs at the DApp layer do exist; many haven't explored the path of Dusk. --- Balancing privacy and verifiability sounds contradictory; this is definitely a technical area worth paying attention to. --- The real demand in the track is genuine, but projects of this type tend to develop slowly after funding. --- Participating in the early stage is a gamble on whether you can survive the next bear market.

View OriginalReply0