GenLayer's current airdrop task design is quite interesting, especially catering to Builders who want to get hands-on. If you're interested in participating, this guide can help you get started quickly.



**Phase One: Basic Setup**

Start with the simplest steps—connect your MetaMask wallet and claim your initial points. Then link your GitHub account, and don't forget to give a Star to the official GenLayer repository. These seemingly tedious steps are actually paving the way for on-chain operations later.

**Phase Two: Network Configuration**

This is where you need to get hands-on. First, add the GenLayer Asimov Network to your wallet. Then, a key step—fund your wallet with GEN testnet tokens. The way to do this is through a Faucet. Visit the official test token Faucet, scroll to the bottom of the page, complete the CAPTCHA, and you'll receive test tokens. Remember, the main purpose of the Faucet is to ensure you have enough balance to deploy contracts, not to hoard test tokens. After completing this, continue by adding the Studio Network.

**Phase Three: Core Actions**

Now comes the truly critical part—deploy your first GenLayer contract. This on-chain activity is the core of the task and is highly valued by the ecosystem. Many participants get stuck at this step, but if you actually deploy, you're already ahead of most people.

**Additional Points Mechanism**

Besides basic tasks, there are other ways to accumulate points. Log in to related platforms with your X account, complete activity tasks, and keep accumulating. Joining the Discord community is also worthwhile, as you can obtain a Builder status, which is very helpful for future ecosystem participation.

**A Note**

If you want to take a more complex route, you can bridge from Sepolia to GEN. But for most people, using the Faucet is enough to complete all necessary contract deployments.

The value of early projects like GenLayer lies in three aspects: actual on-chain deployment actions, linking GitHub developer identities, and long-term ecosystem participation willingness. These are the key factors in judging whether a Builder is serious.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoPhoenixvip
· 11h ago
It's another day stuck at the deployment step. Many have failed here. Only true believers can endure, reborn from the ashes starting with the first on-chain transaction. This time, GenLayer is well-designed, not gimmicky, only screening genuine users. Don't rush to stockpile test tokens, wait a moment. Are you really looking to build or just aiming for airdrops? The difference is huge. The seemingly simple three-stage process actually tests whether you can get through the third step... that's the real challenge. What more needs to be said about being stuck at GitHub star? You should have been out long ago. In a bear market, people's true intentions are revealed; early ecosystem decisions show determination. Have you deployed yet? Wait, is this Faucet really enough, or is it just deliberately limiting the number of users? Opportunities are right in front of you; it all depends on whether you're willing to take the plunge and deploy.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckboxvip
· 11h ago
There are indeed many steps where you might get stuck during deployment, I experienced the same before. This task design is quite good, much more considerate than those pure click-based airdrops. Contract deployment is the real game-changer; everything else is just side dishes. It sounds like the process isn't complicated, just follow the steps. To truly see if a builder is serious, these three points are key—nothing wrong there. The participation requirement in this ecosystem is a bit high, but it also shows that the project team is serious. Be careful with the faucet step; don't frequently refresh the faucet. How difficult is the deployment? Has anyone encountered pitfalls? Early projects that can design rules like this are quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSellervip
· 11h ago
It's that same issue of getting stuck during contract deployment; no wonder most people haven't made any progress.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureAnxietyvip
· 11h ago
Many people are indeed stuck at the deployment step, myself included, but on the flip side, this is an opportunity. Really? Faucet can be used like this? I thought I would need to set up a bridge myself. By the way, is this really worth spending time on? It all seems like repetitive stuff. But if you carefully deploy the contract, you can really see who is a genuine builder and who is just here to exploit. The GitHub integration part is interesting; it allows the ecosystem to identify developers. Clever. I'm just worried it might turn into another big hype project, but initially, not many people have actually deployed anything. Early-stage projects are like this. Anyway, I'll give it a try. At worst, I'll just waste some time. This guide is indeed detailed, but the hardest part is to actually do it yourself. Watching it is easy; actually doing it is another story.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTaxvip
· 11h ago
Getting stuck at the third stage is real; the deployment step has discouraged quite a few people. Once the contract is on the chain, the gap can be widened, and that's the real test. The Faucet design is clever, preventing abuse while providing enough liquidity. It's still important to get the Builder role on Discord; the ecosystem position will be different later.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)