What stands out about the 2026 roadmap is how it prioritizes genuine influence over mere participation. That's the real distinction here.



When community voices actually get heard and reflected in the process, something shifts. It's not just another opinion getting thrown into the mix—it's voices that can genuinely influence decisions, reshape sentiment, and push outcomes toward something more transparent and healthier overall.

That kind of structural approach to governance creates meaningful change.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhobiavip
· 12h ago
NGL, true governance should be like this... but now most projects claim to be community-driven, yet in reality, a few big players hold the power. It's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 12h ago
Nah, it still sounds like the same old rhetoric. The truly influential voices have always been those big whales.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForevervip
· 12h ago
Sounds good, but actually being able to do it is another story.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fightervip
· 12h ago
ngl this is what playing Web3 should look like. Isn't true decentralization exactly about this?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrantvip
· 12h ago
Sounds good, but how many voices can truly influence decisions? Most communities are just shouting slogans, right?
View OriginalReply0
HalfBuddhaMoneyvip
· 12h ago
Real decentralization of power is like this—it's not just about voting and that's it.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)