Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
DeFi project marketing logic is undergoing a dramatic change.
In the past few years, projects seeking liquidity had to spend money on advertising, airdrops, and humble requests to users. But within the ListaDAO framework, everything has flipped—the project team now directly pays holders.
The core of this shift lies in the Gauge Voting mechanism. When PancakeSwap or other stablecoin projects need lisUSD liquidity support, the most cost-effective approach isn't advertising but directly purchasing veLISTA voting rights or bribing those who hold voting power. ListaDAO calls this market the "bribery market."
Essentially, this is a structural shift: from "marketing budget" to "governance rent." Projects find it more efficient to spend money competing for voting rights than on advertising. What does this mean for LISTA holders? Your tokens are no longer just paper assets but a toll booth—able to collect tolls from the entire ecosystem.
This reflects an interesting paradox in DeFi governance incentives: does the commercialization of liquidity command rights improve capital efficiency, or does it evolve into a new form of rent-seeking?