When it comes to the Walrus project, many people focus on short-term price fluctuations, but from its overall development trajectory, the team's true intentions are actually quite different.



Walrus Protocol is not rushing to pursue rapid growth; instead, it filters users at the mechanism level—attracting participants who truly believe in long-term value. This approach is quite rare in Web3 projects.

The cleverness of the project lies in tightly integrating participation, governance, and incentives. Every contribution you make receives clear feedback and rewards, which significantly enhances user stickiness within the ecosystem.

Time is the best test. As the WAL ecosystem gradually evolves, how far this solid accumulation approach can go is indeed worth continuous observation.
WAL-8.87%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MissedAirdropAgainvip
· 31m ago
Another project that claims to "accumulate steadily." After hearing it so many times, I'm really a bit tired. But on the other hand, Walrus's logic for screening long-term players is indeed innovative and deserves recognition.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 13h ago
nah, need to actually see the wallet clustering data before buying this narrative tbh. "mechanism-based filtering" sounds nice on paper but... suspicious activity detected in early token distribution patterns. statistically speaking, most projects claiming "long-term focus" just have worse tokenomics they're trying to dress up
Reply0
DAOdreamervip
· 13h ago
It's rare to see a project that isn't just rushing for quick profits; this method of selecting users is indeed impressive. Long-term value > short-term hype, this is the right approach. Using incentives to firmly bind people is simply genius. Looking forward to seeing how WAL will explode; projects that accumulate slowly often bring the biggest surprises. Put effort into the mechanism layer; no wonder the stickiness is different—this approach is solid. Unlike those coins that keep shouting about price increases all day, Walrus plays this strategy smartly. Participate and earn, feedback and incentives—this ecological design really has some substance. Compared to throwing money into airdrops, I trust this solid mechanism more; truly impressive. Let's wait and see; I feel the momentum will be very strong.
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarianvip
· 13h ago
Speaking of long-termism, it's indeed rare in this circle, as most are still chasing quick money. But the key to mechanism filtering users is whether it can truly retain people in the long run.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 13h ago
Hey, this idea is quite fresh, but I just want to know how many truly patient people can actually hold on...
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者vip
· 13h ago
Oh wow, I have to admit I'm impressed with this mechanism design. It keeps short-term arbitrageurs out and leaves true believers behind. This approach is definitely unique. Wait, now that everything sounds so good, should we really take it at face value? Can Walrus really hold up or will it also decline? Bundling governance incentives sounds appealing, but in practice, it can easily backfire. Solid accumulation sounds nice, but honestly, it just means it needs time to prove itself. It's too early to draw conclusions now. I've seen quite a few user screening methods like this, and not many have survived. I'm optimistic but still cautious.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollectorvip
· 13h ago
Short-term traders really can't understand this logic; truly good projects are never afraid of being slow. But that being said, can this kind of mechanism design really retain people, or will it end up in a mess again? I agree with this view—giving up high growth is actually a form of restraint, which is quite rare in this track. Every day people are shouting about prices, but no one cares about how the project is progressing... This article is a clear-headed voice. It's indeed easy to do participation-based incentives, but the hard part is whether they can truly deliver on their promises, right? Long-term supporters have already laid back, those rushing to make quick money have already left, and only true believers remain. I agree that time will prove this saying right, but the premise is that the team is really working on it. This idea is correct; I just don't know how long it can be sustained, after all, market pressure is right there. So, is WAL worth jumping on now? Has anyone done the math? Feels like it's well written, but it still depends on how the subsequent execution goes.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)