Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Privacy and regulation have always been a pair of archrivals in the crypto ecosystem. On one hand, protecting user privacy; on the other, meeting compliance requirements. The two seem inherently opposed—privacy technology emphasizes invisibility of information, while regulatory audits require transparency of the ledger.
Recently, Dusk has been working on something interesting: they are attempting to combine zero-knowledge proof(ZKP) technology with regulatory audits. At first glance, it sounds a bit magical—the core of zero-knowledge proofs is "I can prove that something is true without revealing any specific details," whereas the regulatory demand is "to open up the data so I can see clearly." How can these two requirements be satisfied simultaneously?
Their solution is to design a layered verification system. To use an analogy: imagine a special vault where all assets are stored in completely private safes. Regulators hold a "透视钥匙" (perspective key), which has a very special purpose—it cannot see specific amounts or whose assets they are, but can immediately verify three points: first, that there are assets inside the safe (proof of existence); second, that the source of funds has been compliant (source compliance verification); third, that all transactions conform to preset rules (transaction validity verification).
The cleverness of this design lies in the fact that users' specific private data remains invisible at all times, yet the overall risk control capability of the system is even stronger. Regulators can ensure network compliance without needing to see detailed account information, and user privacy is truly protected. This "visible risk, invisible data" approach may really solve a long-standing problem in the industry.