Looking at the timeline in a broader perspective, you can understand why decisions like Walrus seem more reasonable. This project isn't rushing to spend big on marketing to boost visibility; instead, it focuses on how to make the protocol operate more stably. This pace means it's not suitable for quick judgments; you need to observe slowly over time.

From a technical standpoint, Walrus adopts a "stability first" approach. Smart contracts are not just execution tools but act like a secure vault of rules—key logic is hardcoded, so no one can modify it at will, and participants can clearly understand what will happen. This is extremely important for long-term operation.

The $WAL token in this system serves as the connecting link. It doesn't exist in isolation but links governance and incentives, creating a self-sustaining cycle for the entire ecosystem. This cycle has a benefit—it can gradually turn short-term enthusiasm into long-term cooperation, naturally enhancing the ecosystem's resilience.

From a user experience perspective, Walrus doesn't artificially create a "miss your chance if you don't participate now" pressure. Users can understand the mechanism before making a choice, and this unhurried pace is inherently suitable for long-term involvement. When an ecosystem no longer relies on "racing ahead," it becomes easier to attract those genuinely committed to long-term investment.

Some projects may look dazzling in the short term but falter over time; meanwhile, Walrus's path, though understated, is filled with features of long-termism.