After looking at so many dazzling tokenomics designs, when I delved into Walrus's model, the first thing that came to mind was—this designer might be an honest person. Without those flashy concepts of infinite inflation, it instead presents a rare sense of clarity. Honestly, this simplicity initially made me a bit uncomfortable. But upon deeper reflection, this is precisely the smartest part.



**Layer 1: Clear total supply, for genuine peace of mind**

The total supply of WAL is fixed, which is truly valuable in an era where many projects can arbitrarily increase issuance. The allocation logic is also transparent—how much goes to development, how much to community incentives, how much to liquidity—there are concrete numbers to speak for themselves. It’s not vague promises. I interpret this transparency as a foundation of trust: I know my tokens won't be inexplicably diluted, and this certainty is a luxury in the volatile crypto world.

**Layer 2: Consumption scenarios make the token truly "come alive"**

A token that only appreciates while sitting in a wallet is just a symbol. WAL is different. It’s used for governance voting, paying service fees, participating in ecosystem activities—all while circulating and being consumed. This creates a positive feedback loop: the higher the ecosystem activity, the greater the demand for WAL; demand increases, and the value foundation becomes more solid. This is real utility, not something built on empty promises.

**Layer 3: Long-term vision of a steady and prudent approach**

Perhaps this model doesn’t seem aggressive enough and may not easily generate FOMO waves in the short term. But I believe projects that can settle down tend to go further.
WAL-5.77%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
EyeOfTheTokenStormvip
· 01-09 17:49
Hmm... After looking at it for a while, the total lock-up is indeed unusual, but how long can it really last? --- A fixed supply sounds good, but the key is whether it can boost usage scenarios; otherwise, it’s just another dormant token. --- This kind of rhetoric sounds a bit familiar. I heard similar promises in 2017, and look what happened... --- Data transparency ≠ solid fundamentals. Don’t be fooled by the design logic; actual adoption is what matters. --- Tokens that truly survive need a continuous burn mechanism; just locking the total supply is far from enough. --- In the short term, the absence of FOMO is actually a risk signal. How can a quiet ecosystem generate strong demand? --- Ultimately, we still need market validation. It’s too early to judge; I suggest observing for three months before making any decisions.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessengervip
· 01-09 17:45
No hype, no negativity. Locking the total supply really helps people sleep soundly at night.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDoctorvip
· 01-09 17:44
Honestly, well-designed projects are indeed scarce, but can a fixed total supply truly guarantee that you won't be cut off... or do I have some doubts?
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 01-09 17:22
Locking the total supply is indeed rare, but the key is whether WAL can be practically used in real scenarios. Having only theories without traffic is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeakervip
· 01-09 17:21
Wow, finally seeing a project that doesn't hype blindly. The logic behind WAL feels so clear and refreshing, it's really satisfying.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)