As a long-term developer focused on privacy public chains, I have been searching for such a foundational platform: one that truly achieves privacy protection, supports efficient cross-chain operations, and most importantly, allows developers to quickly get started and deploy applications.



Over the years, I have seen too many public chains claiming "privacy + high performance," but either their virtual machine ecosystems are incomplete, lacking mature toolchains for developers, or their privacy and cross-chain functionalities are disjointed, failing to meet the needs of financial applications. It wasn't until the end of last year, when I experienced Dusk Foundation's Piecrust virtual machine V0.29, that this situation began to improve.

My initial interest in Piecrust was sparked by the DUSK community's cross-chain privacy application development incentive program. At that time, I happened to have an idea for a privacy transfer tool, but I was stuck on choosing the technology stack—writing ZK-Rollups solutions on Ethereum is too complex, and other privacy public chains' virtual machines generally have limited support for mainstream languages like Rust and C++.

Later, I discovered that Piecrust V0.29 natively supports Wasm contracts and offers complete tooling support for Rust and C++. I downloaded the development package to try it out. I was genuinely surprised—documentation was clear, the development toolchain was easy to set up, and the community responded quickly. From building a simple privacy DApp prototype to testing cross-chain interactions with Harmony, the entire process was much smoother than I had expected.

This experience made me realize that DUSK is worth paying attention to, not because of hype, but because it has genuinely built a usable underlying foundation through continuous technological iteration. Compatibility of the virtual machine, completeness of development tools, privacy-preserving design of cross-chain functions—these seemingly "unsexy" aspects are precisely the key to whether privacy public chains can achieve large-scale adoption.
DUSK-0.74%
ETH-1.16%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketBrovip
· 14h ago
Haha, finally seeing someone genuinely talk about this, not just hype the concept. These days, there are many projects claiming privacy + high performance, but truly usable ones are few. The Wasm+Rust complete toolchain is indeed rare; most are semi-finished products. So, how is it? Are there many applications in the Piecrust ecosystem, or is it just starting out now?
View OriginalReply0
defi_detectivevip
· 14h ago
The article is quite straightforward and not just hype. Piecrust's support for Wasm indeed solves many pain points. But I want to ask, has the security audit for Harmony's cross-chain testing been completed? The combination of privacy + cross-chain sounds great, but the risk of something going wrong is too high. Dusk is indeed doing serious work, much better than those who just shout concepts every day. That said, has the ecosystem really taken off? Are developers actually using it, or is this just a single case? ZK-Rollups are indeed difficult to implement, but does Piecrust also look simple on the surface? When scaled up, there will still be pitfalls to avoid. The biggest fear is another project with a "perfect toolchain and zero applications," relying on hype to sustain itself.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMastervip
· 14h ago
Well... To be honest, it's finally great to see someone explain this thoroughly. I was indeed scared off by too many scam coins before. That's right, those who only hype concepts should indeed be eliminated. A good toolchain is truly good. I have to admit that Rust support is in place; I tried a few before and they all underperformed. But how is Harmony's cross-chain stability? Are there any pitfalls? This is the project that deserves attention. Less marketing, more solid code. Wasm is becoming more and more attractive, much more reliable than proprietary virtual machines. Other projects' documentation is terrible, but at least this one is understandable haha.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHandsvip
· 14h ago
Wow, finally someone explained Piecrust clearly. This is true technology-driven development, not story-driven. Actually, the privacy chain really needs this kind of practical voice. There are too many whitepapers bragging. Full support for Rust is indeed awesome. I'm also stuck on the toolchain, so I guess I need to give it a try. By the way, when is the next DUSK incentive plan? Seems like there's some new ideas. But we still need to see the subsequent iterations. It's too early to say it's usable now. Compared to ETH, ZK is indeed ridiculously complex. Now it feels much clearer. How about the cross-chain with Harmony? How's the stability?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 14h ago
Wow, finally someone telling the truth—it's not just hype, they actually deliver the product. The support for this tech stack really hits the pain point; writing ZK proofs is truly headache-inducing. Why haven't other public chains completed the Rust full toolchain yet? The integrated design for cross-chain privacy sounds promising, but can this really be implemented in practice? However, if the developer friendliness is truly there, then it's definitely worth paying attention to.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)