2026-01-09 16:22:19

In blockchain financial applications, privacy protection and regulatory compliance are often seen as inherently opposed. However, Dusk Network offers an alternative approach — it has built a financial-grade privacy Layer1 that achieves transaction privacy through PLONK zero-knowledge proof technology, while introducing the SBA consensus mechanism, enabling the entire network to protect users' financial data privacy and meet strict regulatory frameworks such as the EU MIFID II and MiCA.

The significance of this solution lies in providing the necessary infrastructure for RWA (real-world asset) tokenization. As more traditional financial assets go on-chain, the key challenge for the industry is how to ensure transaction privacy while gaining regulatory approval. Dusk Network’s technical approach — using zero-knowledge proofs to preserve privacy and consensus mechanisms to ensure compliance — is a pragmatic response to this challenge.

DUSK15.31%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockDetective

· 1h ago

Privacy and compliance have never been a choice between the two; Dusk's move is really quite clever.

View OriginalReply0

SwapWhisperer

· 1h ago

Can privacy and compliance really go hand in hand? This combination of zero-knowledge proofs and consensus mechanisms looks promising, but let's see how it performs in practice.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 01-11 13:29

Can privacy and compliance be satisfied at the same time? Alright, Dusk's combination of zero-knowledge proofs + SBA indeed looks quite solid. RWA on-chain is already difficult, and now with this solution to handle regulation as well, it really feels like the right direction.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinEnjoyer

· 01-09 16:45

The combination of zero-knowledge proofs and consensus mechanisms is interesting; finally, someone is seriously working on balancing privacy and compliance.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 01-09 16:45

Is privacy and compliance really able to coexist? Looking at Dusk's solution, it seems interesting, but whether it can be practically implemented remains to be seen. --- Zero-knowledge proofs are so advanced, do regulatory authorities really buy into them… It still feels a bit too idealistic. --- RWA on the chain definitely requires this kind of thing, but with the PLONK plus SBA combination, I’m a bit skeptical. --- We've been talking about balancing compliance and privacy for a long time. How come Dusk is so confident it can get it done? --- They talk a lot but let’s wait until major assets are actually on the chain before making judgments. --- The EU’s regulations are so strict, just having good technology isn’t enough; policy direction is the key. --- Wow, finally someone realizes that privacy and regulation are not mutually exclusive. --- Feels like yet another "revolutionary solution," the market is already tired of hearing it. --- This technical approach is good, but I wonder if the ecosystem can keep up.

View OriginalReply0

just_vibin_onchain

· 01-09 16:36

Privacy and compliance are never a matter of either/or; Dusk's approach is indeed clear-headed... RWA implementation will inevitably proceed this way sooner or later.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 01-09 16:34

Privacy and compliance are really not at odds. Dusk's approach is quite interesting... The RWA wave is coming, and this issue must be addressed.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 01-09 16:29

Can privacy and compliance really go hand in hand? Dusk's approach is quite interesting. The combination of zero-knowledge proofs and consensus mechanisms is pretty impressive.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-09 16:26

Is privacy compatible with compliance? Dusk's approach is truly innovative; finally, someone is not just playing the either-or game. The combination of zero-knowledge proofs and consensus mechanisms sounds like a double insurance for RWA, but will it really be implemented in the same old way... Will the folks at MIFID II buy into this? Honestly, it's a bit uncertain. It feels like walking a tightrope—balancing privacy and passing audits is incredibly challenging. Dusk's idea is good; the key is how the ecosystem develops afterward. No matter how advanced the technology is, a dead ecosystem is useless. This is the way RWA should be; previous projects didn't think it through. Zero-knowledge proofs again, and what's this SBA? It sounds impressive, but who's actually using it? A compliance-friendly privacy chain sounds like it’s designed for institutions; can retail investors get a piece of the pie... Is it real? Wanting both privacy and regulation? Is that even possible... With the EU so strict, can Dusk really pass the review? Feels a bit like a gamble.

View OriginalReply0