In the current blockchain ecosystem, there is an uncomfortable paradox: while Bitcoin and Ethereum gained widespread recognition, decentralized applications that could compete with Web2 services remain a distant dream. Somnia aims to break this cycle with a radical proposal: a blockchain that processes 400,000+ transactions per second with full EVM compatibility.
This is not just another layer 1 project. Somnia is born from a partnership between Improbable and MSquared, two companies specializing in large-scale distributed systems, with a clear goal to bridge the gap between Web2 performance and the decentralization benefits of Web3.
The numbers that speak for themselves
SOMI - Current market status:
Price: $0.26 USD
24h Change: +0.41%
Daily Volume: $271.79K
Circulating Market Cap: $42.20M
Circulating Supply: 160,200,000 SOMI
Max Supply: 1,000,000,000 SOMI
All-Time High: $1.91
All-Time Low: $0.21
These numbers contextualize where SOMI stands in its lifecycle. With only 16% of the total supply in circulation at launch, the project maintains a gradual unlock schedule over 48 months, ensuring controlled distribution as the ecosystem develops.
The real problem Somnia is trying to solve
Scalability is not enough
Solana boasts 1,608 TPS under real conditions, while Aptos targets 30,000 TPS in its benchmarks. Somnia promises 400,000+ TPS. But speed alone is not the real innovation.
The true issues are three bottlenecks that existing blockchains ignore:
1. Block execution speed bottleneck
Most blockchains rely on interpreted virtual machines (like EVM). This architecture creates significant overhead. Somnia translates EVM bytecode into highly optimized native code, achieving speeds close to contracts written in pure C++.
2. Unpredictable databases
Traditional blockchain databases (LevelDB, RocksDB) create performance variations that can differ up to 1,000 times depending on where data is stored. This makes building responsive real-time applications impossible.
IceDB, Somnia’s custom database, offers read/write operations with latencies of 15-100 nanoseconds, making performance predictable and measurable.
3. Bandwidth constraints
An ERC-20 transfer generates approximately 200 bytes. At 1 million TPS, this translates to 1.5 Gbits/sec of data traffic. Somnia addresses this through streaming compression and BLS signature aggregation, enabling extremely high compression ratios.
The paradox of parallel execution
Many modern blockchains promise parallel execution. The problem: during high-demand events (NFT launches, volatile trading periods), most transactions modify the same state. In these critical moments, parallel execution collapses and everything is serialized. Somnia takes a different approach: making sequential execution extraordinarily fast.
How Somnia’s architecture works
The MultiStream consensus: Revolutionizing block production
In traditional blockchains, a validator proposes each block sequentially. Somnia implements a radically different approach:
Each validator operates its own independent data chain. This completely decouples data production from consensus. While multiple validators generate blocks in parallel (without conflicts), a separate consensus chain aggregates all these chains using a modified PBFT algorithm.
The result: parallel block production + guaranteed consensus. The best of both worlds.
The IceDB database: Deterministic performance
Unlike blockchain databases that create unpredictable behaviors, IceDB provides performance reports for each operation. This allows gas prices to be set based on actual consumption, not worst-case scenarios.
EVM compilation for speed
Somnia compiles EVM bytecode into native code, enabling Ethereum developers to migrate applications with minimal changes while achieving dramatically superior performance. This is a crucial competitive advantage over Solana, Aptos, or Sui, which require rewriting code from scratch.
Who truly benefits? Real use cases
Fully on-chain gaming
Somnia enables creating games where every action occurs directly on the blockchain: character movements, item interactions, everything. Players truly own their assets, and developers can enable modding without centralized control.
SocialFi: Social networks owned by users
Fully decentralized social platforms where users own their accounts, data, and connections. Creators can freely transfer their content, followers, and metrics between apps without being locked into a single ecosystem.
Interoperable metaverses
Somnia acts as the backbone for metaverse applications where assets, avatars, and experiences transfer seamlessly between interconnected virtual worlds.
Decentralized order books
The performance enables fully on-chain order books with price discovery comparable to centralized exchanges, while maintaining total transparency and self-custody.
Real-time enterprise applications
Supply chain tracking, IoT data processing, and other commercial applications requiring immediate transaction finality.
The SOMI economy: Designed for sustainability
Initial distribution: A fixed supply of 1 billion tokens
The launch was carefully structured:
Team (11%): 110M tokens with a 12-month lock-up and 48-month vesting
Launch partners (15%): 150M tokens (including Improbable) with 48-month vesting
Investors (15.15%): 151.5M tokens with 36-month vesting
Advisors (3.58%): 35.8M tokens with 36-month vesting
Ecosystem (27.345%): 273.45M tokens for development, with 48-month vesting
Community (27.925%): 279.25M tokens (the largest allocation) for users, validator rewards, and liquidity
At launch, only 16.02% (160.2M tokens) entered circulation. The gradual unlock occurs over 48 months.
The three functions of SOMI
1. Network security through staking
Validators must lock 5 million SOMI to operate nodes. Holders can delegate their SOMI to validators and earn rewards. This mechanism secures the network while providing passive income.
2. Transaction fee payments
All operations require SOMI for gas. The dynamic pricing model offers volume discounts: applications reaching 400+ TPS see fee reductions of up to 90%. This incentivizes building scalable applications.
3. Decentralized governance
SOMI holders participate in governance through a multi-layer structure: Token House, Validator Council, Developer Council, and User Assembly. This structure prevents a single group from controlling the network.
The deflationary model
50% of all transaction fees are burned, reducing the total supply as the network grows. The other 50% is distributed to validators and stakers. This mechanism aligns economic incentives with the growth of actual network usage.
Somnia versus its competitors: An important comparison
Raw speed versus smart architecture
Solana: ~1,608 real TPS, but requires a new development stack
Aptos: Aims for 30,000 TPS in benchmarks, also a new stack
Sui: Move language, another isolated ecosystem
Somnia: 400,000+ TPS with full EVM, inheriting all Ethereum talent
The key difference: Somnia allows Ethereum developers to migrate applications with minimal changes.
The unique approach of Somnia
While competitors aim to be “general-purpose” blockchains, Somnia explicitly optimizes for massive real-time applications: games, social networks, metaverses that require consistent finality in less than a second.
This specialization is a strength, not a limitation. It’s like asking why a Ferrari can’t be a truck: because it was built for something different.
Economic sustainability
Somnia’s dynamic pricing model creates sustainable economies for both high-performance applications and validators. Competitors with fixed fees can become prohibitively expensive during high demand.
The roadmap: Three phases to full decentralization
Bootstrap Phase (0-6 months)
Fundamental infrastructure with primary control by the Foundation Board. Initial governance groups are formed.
Transition Phase (6-24 months)
Full participation in governance with formal proposal processes. The foundation retains final control but with operational governance systems.
Mature Phase (Year 2+)
Complete decentralization with delegated control to appropriate governance groups. Emergency veto capabilities are maintained.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Somnia (SOMI): The high-performance blockchain that promises to revolutionize mass dApps
Why does Somnia matter now?
In the current blockchain ecosystem, there is an uncomfortable paradox: while Bitcoin and Ethereum gained widespread recognition, decentralized applications that could compete with Web2 services remain a distant dream. Somnia aims to break this cycle with a radical proposal: a blockchain that processes 400,000+ transactions per second with full EVM compatibility.
This is not just another layer 1 project. Somnia is born from a partnership between Improbable and MSquared, two companies specializing in large-scale distributed systems, with a clear goal to bridge the gap between Web2 performance and the decentralization benefits of Web3.
The numbers that speak for themselves
SOMI - Current market status:
These numbers contextualize where SOMI stands in its lifecycle. With only 16% of the total supply in circulation at launch, the project maintains a gradual unlock schedule over 48 months, ensuring controlled distribution as the ecosystem develops.
The real problem Somnia is trying to solve
Scalability is not enough
Solana boasts 1,608 TPS under real conditions, while Aptos targets 30,000 TPS in its benchmarks. Somnia promises 400,000+ TPS. But speed alone is not the real innovation.
The true issues are three bottlenecks that existing blockchains ignore:
1. Block execution speed bottleneck
Most blockchains rely on interpreted virtual machines (like EVM). This architecture creates significant overhead. Somnia translates EVM bytecode into highly optimized native code, achieving speeds close to contracts written in pure C++.
2. Unpredictable databases
Traditional blockchain databases (LevelDB, RocksDB) create performance variations that can differ up to 1,000 times depending on where data is stored. This makes building responsive real-time applications impossible.
IceDB, Somnia’s custom database, offers read/write operations with latencies of 15-100 nanoseconds, making performance predictable and measurable.
3. Bandwidth constraints
An ERC-20 transfer generates approximately 200 bytes. At 1 million TPS, this translates to 1.5 Gbits/sec of data traffic. Somnia addresses this through streaming compression and BLS signature aggregation, enabling extremely high compression ratios.
The paradox of parallel execution
Many modern blockchains promise parallel execution. The problem: during high-demand events (NFT launches, volatile trading periods), most transactions modify the same state. In these critical moments, parallel execution collapses and everything is serialized. Somnia takes a different approach: making sequential execution extraordinarily fast.
How Somnia’s architecture works
The MultiStream consensus: Revolutionizing block production
In traditional blockchains, a validator proposes each block sequentially. Somnia implements a radically different approach:
Each validator operates its own independent data chain. This completely decouples data production from consensus. While multiple validators generate blocks in parallel (without conflicts), a separate consensus chain aggregates all these chains using a modified PBFT algorithm.
The result: parallel block production + guaranteed consensus. The best of both worlds.
The IceDB database: Deterministic performance
Unlike blockchain databases that create unpredictable behaviors, IceDB provides performance reports for each operation. This allows gas prices to be set based on actual consumption, not worst-case scenarios.
EVM compilation for speed
Somnia compiles EVM bytecode into native code, enabling Ethereum developers to migrate applications with minimal changes while achieving dramatically superior performance. This is a crucial competitive advantage over Solana, Aptos, or Sui, which require rewriting code from scratch.
Who truly benefits? Real use cases
Fully on-chain gaming
Somnia enables creating games where every action occurs directly on the blockchain: character movements, item interactions, everything. Players truly own their assets, and developers can enable modding without centralized control.
SocialFi: Social networks owned by users
Fully decentralized social platforms where users own their accounts, data, and connections. Creators can freely transfer their content, followers, and metrics between apps without being locked into a single ecosystem.
Interoperable metaverses
Somnia acts as the backbone for metaverse applications where assets, avatars, and experiences transfer seamlessly between interconnected virtual worlds.
Decentralized order books
The performance enables fully on-chain order books with price discovery comparable to centralized exchanges, while maintaining total transparency and self-custody.
Real-time enterprise applications
Supply chain tracking, IoT data processing, and other commercial applications requiring immediate transaction finality.
The SOMI economy: Designed for sustainability
Initial distribution: A fixed supply of 1 billion tokens
The launch was carefully structured:
At launch, only 16.02% (160.2M tokens) entered circulation. The gradual unlock occurs over 48 months.
The three functions of SOMI
1. Network security through staking
Validators must lock 5 million SOMI to operate nodes. Holders can delegate their SOMI to validators and earn rewards. This mechanism secures the network while providing passive income.
2. Transaction fee payments
All operations require SOMI for gas. The dynamic pricing model offers volume discounts: applications reaching 400+ TPS see fee reductions of up to 90%. This incentivizes building scalable applications.
3. Decentralized governance
SOMI holders participate in governance through a multi-layer structure: Token House, Validator Council, Developer Council, and User Assembly. This structure prevents a single group from controlling the network.
The deflationary model
50% of all transaction fees are burned, reducing the total supply as the network grows. The other 50% is distributed to validators and stakers. This mechanism aligns economic incentives with the growth of actual network usage.
Somnia versus its competitors: An important comparison
Raw speed versus smart architecture
The key difference: Somnia allows Ethereum developers to migrate applications with minimal changes.
The unique approach of Somnia
While competitors aim to be “general-purpose” blockchains, Somnia explicitly optimizes for massive real-time applications: games, social networks, metaverses that require consistent finality in less than a second.
This specialization is a strength, not a limitation. It’s like asking why a Ferrari can’t be a truck: because it was built for something different.
Economic sustainability
Somnia’s dynamic pricing model creates sustainable economies for both high-performance applications and validators. Competitors with fixed fees can become prohibitively expensive during high demand.
The roadmap: Three phases to full decentralization
Bootstrap Phase (0-6 months)
Fundamental infrastructure with primary control by the Foundation Board. Initial governance groups are formed.
Transition Phase (6-24 months)
Full participation in governance with formal proposal processes. The foundation retains final control but with operational governance systems.
Mature Phase (Year 2+)
Complete decentralization with delegated control to appropriate governance groups. Emergency veto capabilities are maintained.
Technical priorities include: improved developer tools, zero-knowledge proof integration, validator infrastructure scaling, and ecosystem expansion.