Privacy protection is always a topic that cannot be avoided in on-chain transactions. Many people face a dilemma when choosing privacy solutions: should they opt for privacy coins or mixing tools?



Monero, as a representative of privacy coins, has privacy features directly integrated into its protocol layer, with transactions by default being private. Tornado Cash and similar mixers, on the other hand, implement privacy functions on existing public blockchains through smart contracts to facilitate fund mixing.

The differences between the two are not only in technical architecture but also in user experience and risk considerations. The advantage of privacy coins is their thorough privacy, but liquidity and trading pairs are relatively limited. Mixing tools are more flexible but require additional steps and face greater external regulatory scrutiny.

Which option do you prefer? Or do you think both have their merits and should be chosen flexibly based on the scenario?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ProtocolRebelvip
· 01-09 05:52
Monero is really useless, with liquidity so poor it's exploding, switching to another coin is also difficult. After the big crackdown, mixing coins is no longer interesting; everyone has to lie low. Honestly, it still depends on your risk preference. I use both, depending on my mood. The tornado wave being sanctioned really scared people stiff; now who dares to throw money into it? Privacy coins sound great, but actual transactions are an absolute nightmare experience. The core issue is transaction depth; even the most user-friendly protocol layer is useless without it. Neither is perfect; they are just products of compromise. Let's accept reality.
View OriginalReply0
PumpingCroissantvip
· 01-08 14:36
To be honest, Monero's approach is very pure, but the trading pairs really suck. It still depends on the scenario. Mixing tools are a bit troublesome, but in terms of liquidity, they are definitely more comfortable than privacy coins. However, with current strict regulations, using mixers requires constant caution. It feels like privacy coins are actually more "above board." Everyone has their own headaches. I'm still experimenting... Liquidity is really a hard flaw for Monero. How are you guys solving it?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerGasvip
· 01-07 01:43
In plain terms, this issue is essentially a game-theoretic equilibrium between centralized risk and interaction costs. Monero is indeed thorough, but the liquidity is... limited in arbitrage opportunities. I'd rather spend more on gas fees.
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugeevip
· 01-06 06:57
Honestly, I've given up on Monero a long time ago. There are too few trading pairs to use effectively, and Tornado Cash is still more convenient... But now I have to choose based on my mood, anyway, it's a bit frustrating.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoFortuneTellervip
· 01-06 06:57
To be honest, Monero's approach is too extreme, with liquidity so poor that you have to rely on OTC for even stablecoins... Mixing services are a bit more troublesome but at least you can still use ETH, USDC, and others. Regulatory pressure is high, but as long as you're cautious, it's manageable.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarbervip
· 01-06 06:52
Honestly, choosing privacy coins now is just asking for trouble. The liquidity is extremely poor. Although Tornado's approach has high regulatory risks, it can still be used, and that's the reality. Privacy and convenience are a trade-off... you can't have both. I just want to ask, do people who make large transactions still use these? Mixers are not perfect, but they are much better than the cumbersome privacy coins in practice. In my opinion, you should have both options ready. Choose based on transaction size and flexibility—there's no absolute answer.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetectivevip
· 01-06 06:46
I've used Monero, but there are too few trading pairs, which is a bit annoying... Mixing services are fast, but with such strict regulations now, it always feels a bit risky.
View OriginalReply0
ThesisInvestorvip
· 01-06 06:44
Monero liquidity is really a weakness, I just can't sell it... It's still better to use it with mixing tools for a smoother experience.
View OriginalReply0
DYORMastervip
· 01-06 06:41
Monero liquidity is indeed a bit troublesome, but at least I can sleep soundly. Tornado currently carries too much risk.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXMvip
· 01-06 06:35
Honestly, I've used Monero before, but there aren't really many trading pairs... Tornado's system is too complicated, and the regulatory risks are high. Instead of fussing over it, it's better to just use CEX directly.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)