After working in the DeFi ecosystem for a long time, you'll find that many protocols like to promote themselves with slogans like "sufficient assets," "safe and reliable," and "trust us." However, once you ask where the funds are specifically located, how they are used, and how the proportions are allocated, the other party often starts to dodge the question.



This is a common problem in the industry. It's easy to say, but when it comes to actually discussing it, people tend to be vague and avoid the core issues. Many users have also been scared off by this kind of rhetoric.

Now, some projects are beginning to change their approach by introducing asset reserve proof mechanisms, putting the money in the open, and increasing transparency. This approach is at least more sincere and gives us a real opportunity to verify whether a protocol is truly "reliable." Trust, after all, still depends on data.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DefiPlaybookvip
· 2h ago
It's the old trick again "Trust us," but it's better to just look at on-chain data for a more straightforward understanding. --- Proof of Reserve is truly impressive this time; finally someone has revealed their cards, much better than those protocols that constantly boast about "adequate assets." --- Basically, promises without real data support are useless. The trust cost in this industry is too high. --- Finally, some projects are brave enough to publish their funds; the previous tactics of dodging the issue really scared people off. --- Increasing transparency is a good thing, but it also depends on whether the code has been audited; just having data isn't enough. --- This is what DeFi should look like—data is king, nothing beats on-chain facts. --- Asset reserve proof mechanisms sound good, but the prerequisite is that internal misappropriation can still be prevented.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityStrugglervip
· 2h ago
Transparency is often talked about but rarely practiced. Finally, a project dares to reveal its data openly.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxietyvip
· 2h ago
Here comes that old trick again. The asset proof is all on the blockchain, and you're still trying to tell me to trust us.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gainsvip
· 2h ago
Ah, really, I still dare to boast about being "financially sufficient," and I just want to laugh. Another one dodging the issue, I'll just pass. I really can't stand projects that don't speak with data.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 2h ago
Haha, it's the same old story—talking a lot of fancy words but playing deaf and mute when asked. Hey, I think projects that are willing to openly share their books are worth paying attention to. The transparency mechanism should have been popularized long ago; there's nothing to hide or conceal. Finally, someone is starting to do the right thing.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)